• DocumentCode
    3354867
  • Title

    Reconstruction comparison and a composite segmentation method for electron tomography

  • Author

    Gopinath, Ajay

  • Author_Institution
    Dept. of Electr. & Comput. Eng., Univ. of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA
  • fYear
    2010
  • fDate
    26-29 Sept. 2010
  • Firstpage
    585
  • Lastpage
    588
  • Abstract
    Electron Tomography (ET) reconstruction involves solving an inverse problem to generate a volumetric map from multiple projection images (tilt-series) acquired from an Electron Microscope (EM). Due to limitations in the acquisition process no unique solution exists for the inverse problem. Hence the reconstructed volumes are different depending on the choice of reconstruction method used. Here, we analyze and compare reconstructions from four different techniques. Secondly, a novel technique for composite segmentation is presented where reconstructed volumes from four different methods and their segmented maps are combined. This method annotates the segmented output with a confidence level based on a voting scheme. This enhances structure visualization and provides comprehensive structure information with error and uncertainty annotations at a voxel level.
  • Keywords
    image reconstruction; image segmentation; tomography; composite segmentation; electron tomography reconstruction; image acquisition; multiple projection images; Electron microscopy; Image reconstruction; Image segmentation; Reconstruction algorithms; Signal to noise ratio; Subspace constraints; Electron Microscopy; Reconstruction; Segmentation; Tomography;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • Conference_Titel
    Image Processing (ICIP), 2010 17th IEEE International Conference on
  • Conference_Location
    Hong Kong
  • ISSN
    1522-4880
  • Print_ISBN
    978-1-4244-7992-4
  • Electronic_ISBN
    1522-4880
  • Type

    conf

  • DOI
    10.1109/ICIP.2010.5652774
  • Filename
    5652774