Title :
Text, Table and Graph -- Which is Faster and More Accurate to Understand?
Author :
Prasad, Gollapudi V R J Sai ; Ojha, Amitash
Author_Institution :
Cognitive Sci. Lab., IIIT-Hyderabad, Hyderabad, India
Abstract :
Today´s school and college textbooks are full of static, multimodal content. This research investigates which of the three modalities - text, table or graph - is more efficient in conveying a given message to students. For fixed content, we hypothesized that graph representation is better of the three for comprehension. Experiment results (N=25)suggest that graphs are indeed 25.5% faster to understand than text and 46.5% faster than tables. In terms of accuracy of responses, graphs were 13.5% worse than text and 8.6%more accurate than tables. When the ratio of amount of accurate answers for each second taken to respond was checked, graphs were faster as they enabled downloading of5.7% of the answer in one second time, whereas text downloaded only 3.6% and table only 3.9%. For our experimental data, it appears that graph mode might be faster but less accurate. However, when it comes to amount of correct comprehension, graph mode does come out better.
Keywords :
graph theory; text analysis; college textbooks; graph representation; multimodal content; school textbooks; static content; table; Accuracy; Atmospheric measurements; Companies; Particle measurements; Software; Time factors; Visualization; comprehension; graph; graphcomprehension; modes; multimodality; speed of understanding; table; text;
Conference_Titel :
Technology for Education (T4E), 2012 IEEE Fourth International Conference on
Conference_Location :
Hyderabad
Print_ISBN :
978-1-4673-2173-0
DOI :
10.1109/T4E.2012.18