• DocumentCode
    3373969
  • Title

    Evaluation criteria of HDLs: VHDL compared to Verilog, UDL/I and M

  • Author

    Maginot, Serge

  • Author_Institution
    LEDA SA, Meylan, France
  • fYear
    1992
  • fDate
    7-10 Sep 1992
  • Firstpage
    746
  • Lastpage
    751
  • Abstract
    VHSIC hardware description language (VHDL) is compared to three other well-known hardware description languages: Verilog (from Cadence Design Systems, now public), UDL/1 (new Japanese standards,) and M (from Mentor Graphics). This comparative study parallels the fundamental concepts of these languages and highlights the different design processes and methodologies they require. VHDL is a general-purpose modeling language, whereas Verilog, UDL/I and M are more dedicated to IC modeling. The predefined environment of VHDL compares poorly to the implicit IC environment of other languages
  • Keywords
    circuit CAD; specification languages; Cadence Design; HDLs; IC modeling; Japanese standards; M; Mentor Graphics; UDL/I; VHDL; VHSIC hardware description language; Verilog; general-purpose modeling language; Context awareness; Contracts; Design automation; Design methodology; Graphics; Hardware design languages; History; Natural languages; Process design; Silicon;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • Conference_Titel
    Design Automation Conference, 1992., EURO-VHDL '92, EURO-DAC '92. European
  • Conference_Location
    Hamburg
  • Print_ISBN
    0-8186-2780-8
  • Type

    conf

  • DOI
    10.1109/EURDAC.1992.246180
  • Filename
    246180