DocumentCode :
3373969
Title :
Evaluation criteria of HDLs: VHDL compared to Verilog, UDL/I and M
Author :
Maginot, Serge
Author_Institution :
LEDA SA, Meylan, France
fYear :
1992
fDate :
7-10 Sep 1992
Firstpage :
746
Lastpage :
751
Abstract :
VHSIC hardware description language (VHDL) is compared to three other well-known hardware description languages: Verilog (from Cadence Design Systems, now public), UDL/1 (new Japanese standards,) and M (from Mentor Graphics). This comparative study parallels the fundamental concepts of these languages and highlights the different design processes and methodologies they require. VHDL is a general-purpose modeling language, whereas Verilog, UDL/I and M are more dedicated to IC modeling. The predefined environment of VHDL compares poorly to the implicit IC environment of other languages
Keywords :
circuit CAD; specification languages; Cadence Design; HDLs; IC modeling; Japanese standards; M; Mentor Graphics; UDL/I; VHDL; VHSIC hardware description language; Verilog; general-purpose modeling language; Context awareness; Contracts; Design automation; Design methodology; Graphics; Hardware design languages; History; Natural languages; Process design; Silicon;
fLanguage :
English
Publisher :
ieee
Conference_Titel :
Design Automation Conference, 1992., EURO-VHDL '92, EURO-DAC '92. European
Conference_Location :
Hamburg
Print_ISBN :
0-8186-2780-8
Type :
conf
DOI :
10.1109/EURDAC.1992.246180
Filename :
246180
Link To Document :
بازگشت