DocumentCode :
3377066
Title :
A comparison of air flow and shielding effectiveness of perforated enclosure panels
Author :
Jackman, Tom ; Ju, Wendy ; Gisin, Franz ; Duckett, Jim ; Evans, Joseph
Author_Institution :
Silicon Graphics Inc., Mountain View, CA, USA
Volume :
2
fYear :
1999
fDate :
1999
Firstpage :
583
Abstract :
The goals of the thermal engineer and EMC engineer often lead to contradictory design requirements. The EMC engineer wants smaller cooling openings to provide more attenuation of electromagnetic leakage through an enclosure, while the thermal engineer wants larger openings to minimize the restriction of air flow. Previous research on perforated enclosure panels has focused mainly on their EMC performance with little thought given to how they impact the flow of cooling air. This paper addresses this deficiency by examining how the shapes and locations of the perforations also impact these two critical areas
Keywords :
cooling; electromagnetic compatibility; electromagnetic shielding; laminar flow; packaging; EMC engineer; EMC performance; cooling air flow; cooling openings; design requirements; electromagnetic leakage attenuation; laminar air flow; perforated enclosure panels; perforation location; perforation shapes; shielding effectiveness; thermal engineer; Apertures; Attenuation; Clocks; Cooling; Design engineering; Electromagnetic compatibility; Graphics; Silicon; Testing; Thermal engineering;
fLanguage :
English
Publisher :
ieee
Conference_Titel :
Electromagnetic Compatibility, 1999 IEEE International Symposium on
Conference_Location :
Seattle, WA
Print_ISBN :
0-7803-5057-X
Type :
conf
DOI :
10.1109/ISEMC.1999.810080
Filename :
810080
Link To Document :
بازگشت