• DocumentCode
    3387269
  • Title

    Comparison of isothermal wafer-level EM and package-level EM for via test structure in dual damascene low k/Copper process

  • Author

    Chang, M.N. ; Chang, K.P. ; Sue, K.C.

  • Author_Institution
    United Microelectron. Corp., Hsin-Chu, Taiwan
  • fYear
    2002
  • fDate
    21-24 Oct. 2002
  • Firstpage
    192
  • Lastpage
    195
  • Abstract
    In this study, an isothermal wafer-level electromigration (EM) test method has been applied in via test-structure. The dual damascene low k/Copper process was evaluated by such a highly accelerated test way. A test structure with 0.28um via landed on metal line-end was used and stressed with downstream electronic direction. By using five kinds of liner processes, the results of wafer-level reliability (WLR) and packager-level reliability (PLR) are compared. The lifetime and shape factor projection from package-level to wafer-level is significant under these processes. The current exponent and activation energy of both methods were also investigated. The activation energy will be optimistic while WLR test temperature is below 400°C. While the test condition is below 400°C, the activation energy value of WLR will be more close to PLR. Finally, the failure mode of WLR and PLR will also be compared and discussed.
  • Keywords
    copper; electromigration; failure analysis; integrated circuit metallisation; integrated circuit reliability; integrated circuit testing; life testing; 0.28 micron; 400 degC; Cu; accelerated testing; activation energy; current exponent; electromigration lifetime; failure mode; isothermal wafer-level EM test; liner process; low-k/copper dual damascene via; package-level EM test; package-level reliability; shape factor; wafer-level reliability; Artificial intelligence; Copper; Electromigration; Electronics packaging; Heating; Isothermal processes; Temperature; Testing; Thermal resistance; Wafer scale integration;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • Conference_Titel
    Integrated Reliability Workshop Final Report, 2002. IEEE International
  • Print_ISBN
    0-7803-7558-0
  • Type

    conf

  • DOI
    10.1109/IRWS.2002.1194266
  • Filename
    1194266