• DocumentCode
    3396223
  • Title

    Pulse versus CW Laser Line Scan Imaging Detection Methods: Simulation Results

  • Author

    Caimi, Frank M. ; Dalgleish, Fraser R. ; Giddings, Thomas E. ; Shirron, Joseph J. ; Mazel, Charles ; Chiang, Kophu

  • Author_Institution
    Harbor Branch Oceanogr. Inst., Ft. Pierce
  • fYear
    2007
  • fDate
    18-21 June 2007
  • Firstpage
    1
  • Lastpage
    4
  • Abstract
    Laser line scan (LLS) systems rely upon narrow angular field apertures and displacement between emitter and receiver to reduce volume backscatter from the common volume near the target. With this configuration, multiple volume scattering near the sensor becomes a significant contribution to the total backscatter return. Detection of continuous wave laser return signals is complicated at the range limit of these systems due to the temporal overlap between the target return and the backscatter return. In the compact implementation of these systems, necessary when the deployment platform is the 12" or 21" diameter AUV, this detection ambiguity can lead to a significant degradation in imaging performance. Detection methods must therefore separate the two signals and estimate the energy returning from the target alone. Indeed, the use of pulsed laser illumination under some conditions allows for temporal separation of the target and volume scattering return signals. However, this method relies upon knowledge of the target distance and establishment of a gated detection scheme. We present a comparison of simulation results for both the CW and pulsed-laser cases in a range of turbid water conditions and at differing optical attenuation lengths approaching the limiting case for these types of underwater imagers. These simulations are performed using models developed by Metron Inc. (Reston, VA), and allow both a time history and image quality comparison. The goal of this simulation work is to identify the operational and environmental conditions under which each scheme is usable for the AUV-deployed scenario. Experimental results supporting these findings will be presented as available.
  • Keywords
    geophysical signal processing; image processing; optical scanners; remotely operated vehicles; signal detection; underwater vehicles; AUV; CW laser line scan imaging detection methods; Metron Inc; Reston; US Office of Naval Research; VA; angular apertures; continuous wave laser return signals; emitter; environmental conditions; gated detection scheme; image quality comparison; imaging performance degradation; optical attenuation lengths; pulsed laser illumination; receiver; target return signals; temporal separation; turbid water conditions; underwater imagers type; volume scattering return signals; Apertures; Backscatter; Degradation; Lighting; Optical attenuators; Optical imaging; Optical pulses; Optical receivers; Optical scattering; Optical sensors; Laser Imaging Systems; Laser Line Scan; Pulsed Laser Line Scan; Underwater Imaging;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • Conference_Titel
    OCEANS 2007 - Europe
  • Conference_Location
    Aberdeen
  • Print_ISBN
    978-1-4244-0635-7
  • Electronic_ISBN
    978-1-4244-0635-7
  • Type

    conf

  • DOI
    10.1109/OCEANSE.2007.4302476
  • Filename
    4302476