• DocumentCode
    3418574
  • Title

    Comparison of Different Definitions of Field Strength Used in Reverberation Chamber Standards

  • Author

    Arnaut, Luk R. ; Krauthäuser, Hans-Georg ; Höijer, Magnus

  • Author_Institution
    Nat. Phys. Lab., Teddington
  • fYear
    2007
  • fDate
    9-13 July 2007
  • Firstpage
    1
  • Lastpage
    5
  • Abstract
    In different standards involving reverberation chambers, the field strength is defined either using the magnitude of the vector (total) electric field, or the magnitude of a Cartesian (rectilinear) field component. We compare these methods for determining the maximum field strength. The ratio of the maximum of the total field to the maximum of a Cartesian component is a random variable whose probability distribution and statistics are derived and investigated. The mean value of this ratio is compared with the ratio of the respective mean values. Its standard deviation enables the estimation of confidence levels when comparing or converting between single measurements of the maximum total and maximum rectangular field Theoretical results are illustrated and compared with measured results obtained in four different reverberation chambers.
  • Keywords
    electric fields; electromagnetic compatibility; statistical distributions; Cartesian field component; field strength; probability distribution; random variable; reverberation chamber standards; vector electric field; Electromagnetic compatibility; Fluctuations; Immunity testing; Laboratories; Measurement standards; Metrology; Probability distribution; Random variables; Reverberation chamber; Statistical distributions;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • Conference_Titel
    Electromagnetic Compatibility, 2007. EMC 2007. IEEE International Symposium on
  • Conference_Location
    Honolulu, HI
  • Print_ISBN
    1-4244-1349-4
  • Electronic_ISBN
    1-4244-1350-8
  • Type

    conf

  • DOI
    10.1109/ISEMC.2007.199
  • Filename
    4305779