• DocumentCode
    3481505
  • Title

    Methodology development for counterfeit component mitigation

  • Author

    Huehne, Martin ; Lee, Jong Chul ; Miles, Harrison ; Schaffer, Mark

  • Author_Institution
    Celestica, Thailand
  • fYear
    2013
  • fDate
    11-14 Aug. 2013
  • Firstpage
    1073
  • Lastpage
    1081
  • Abstract
    Counterfeit components have become a multi-million dollar, yet undesirable, part of the electronics industry. The profitability of the counterfeit industry rests in large part to its ability to recognize supply constraints and quickly respond, effectively taking advantage of a complex and vulnerable supply chain. Events like product obsolescence, long life cycles, economic downturn and recovery, local disruptions in manufacturing due to natural disasters, and lack of proper IP legislation all represent opportunities for the counterfeit component industry to flourish. Electronic counterfeits affect every segment of the market, including consumer goods, networking and communications, medical, automotive, aerospace, and defense. At the manufacturing level, the use of undetected counterfeits leads to increased scrap rates, early field failures, and increased rework rates. While this presents a major problem impacting profitability, the use of counterfeit components in high reliability applications can have far more serious consequences with severe or lethal outcomes. For some time the weak link in the supply chain has been identified at the level of independent distributors. With the emergence of new legislation and through the efforts of different industry entities, new standards and guidelines are now available for suppliers to establish and maintain product traceability and to establish receiving inspection and detection protocols. There is no substitute for a healthy supply chain, and distributors play an essential role in the dynamics of the system. At the same time, there is an increased awareness of the need for proper management of electronic waste. Regardless of the nature of the counterfeits, whether cloned, skimmed, or re-branded, counterfeits are dangerous and too expensive to be ignored. The work presented here by the iNEMI Counterfeit Components-Assessment project group takes a more comprehensive view of the problem by surveying the possible points of ent- y in the supply chain and assessing the impact of counterfeit components on the industry at various points of use. We then propose a risk assessment matrix that can be used to reduce the risks for manufacturers.
  • Keywords
    electronics industry; legislation; reliability; risk management; supply chains; IP legislation; counterfeit component industry; counterfeit component mitigation; detection protocols; early field failures; electronic counterfeits; electronic waste management; electronics industry; iNEMI counterfeit components-assessment project group; inspection protocols; manufacturing level; reliability applications; risk assessment matrix; scrap rates; vulnerable supply chain; Consumer electronics; Industries; Inspection; Manufacturing; Materials; Supply chains; Counterfeit component; Counterfeit detection; Risk assessment matrix; Supply chain;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • Conference_Titel
    Electronic Packaging Technology (ICEPT), 2013 14th International Conference on
  • Conference_Location
    Dalian
  • Type

    conf

  • DOI
    10.1109/ICEPT.2013.6756645
  • Filename
    6756645