DocumentCode
3556857
Title
Dynamic stressing of thin oxides
Author
Fong, Y. ; Chen, I.C. ; Holland, S. ; Lee, J. ; Hu, C.
Author_Institution
University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA
Volume
32
fYear
1986
fDate
1986
Firstpage
664
Lastpage
667
Abstract
The breakdown of thin oxides due to DC stressing and uni-polarity and bi-polarity dynamic stressing has been compared. For dynamic stressing, the total integrated charge-to-breakdown, QBD , and the total stressed time-to-breakdown, tBD , depend on both the pulse width and duty cycle of the stressing voltage. Uni-polarity and bipolarity stressing produce similar results. In all cases, both QBD and tBD of dynamic stressing are greater than those of DC stressing. For 0.1 ms pulses, QBD and tBD are about four times larger than what DC stressing would predict. The main reason for the higher QBD and tBD under dynamic stressing is reduced hole trapping at localized weak oxide areas. A transient hole generation and relaxation model is proposed to quantitatively explain the increase in QBD for dynamic stressing.
Keywords
Breakdown voltage; Capacitors; Charge carrier processes; Circuit testing; Design for quality; Electric breakdown; Electron traps; Life estimation; Life testing; Space vector pulse width modulation;
fLanguage
English
Publisher
ieee
Conference_Titel
Electron Devices Meeting, 1986 International
Type
conf
DOI
10.1109/IEDM.1986.191279
Filename
1486537
Link To Document