• DocumentCode
    3557020
  • Title

    A comparison of two approaches to build reliable distributed file servers

  • Author

    Bhide, Anupam ; Elnozahy, Elmootazbellah N. ; Morgan, Stephen P. ; Siegel, Alex

  • Author_Institution
    IBM Thomas J. Watson Res. Center, Yorktown Heights, NY, USA
  • fYear
    1991
  • fDate
    20-24 May 1991
  • Firstpage
    616
  • Lastpage
    623
  • Abstract
    Several existing distributed file systems provide reliability by server replication. An alternative approach is to use dual-ported disks accessible to a server and a backup. The two approaches are compared by examining an example of each. Deceit is a replicated file server that emphasizes flexibility. HA-NFS is an example of the second approach that emphasizes efficiency and simplicity. The two file servers run on the same hardware and implement SUN´s NFS protocol. The comparison shows that replicated servers are more flexible and tolerant of a wider variety of faults. On the other hand, the dual-ported disks approach is more efficient and simpler to implement. When tolerating single failure, dual-ported disks also give somewhat better availability
  • Keywords
    computer networks; distributed processing; fault tolerant computing; file servers; protocols; Deceit; HA-NFS; SUN´s NFS protocol; dual-ported disks; reliability; reliable distributed file servers; server replication; Computer science; Concrete; Costs; File servers; File systems; Hardware; Maintenance; Network servers; Protocols;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • Conference_Titel
    Distributed Computing Systems, 1991., 11th International Conference on
  • Conference_Location
    Arlington, TX
  • Print_ISBN
    0-8186-2144-3
  • Type

    conf

  • DOI
    10.1109/ICDCS.1991.148734
  • Filename
    148734