• DocumentCode
    3569349
  • Title

    Differentiating assessment from evaluation as continuous improvement tools [for engineering education]

  • Author

    Parker, Peter E. ; Fleming, Paul D. ; Beyerlein, Steve ; Apple, Dan ; Krumsieg, Karl

  • Author_Institution
    Coll. of Eng. & Appl. Sci., Western Michigan Univ., Kalamazoo, MI, USA
  • Volume
    1
  • fYear
    2001
  • fDate
    6/23/1905 12:00:00 AM
  • Abstract
    Unleashing the potential of continuous improvement in teaching/learning requires an appreciation of the difference in spirit between assessment and evaluation. Assessment is frequently confused and confounded with evaluation. The purpose of an evaluation is to judge the quality of a performance or work product against a standard. The fundamental nature of assessment is that a mentor values helping a mentee and is willing to expend the effort to provide quality feedback that will enhance the mentee´s future performance. While both processes involve collecting data about a performance or work product, what is done with these data in each process is substantially different and invokes a very different mindset. This paper reviews the,principles and mindset underlying quality assessment and then illustrates how feedback can be enhanced within the framework of structured assessment reports
  • Keywords
    engineering education; quality control; teaching; continuous improvement tools; engineering education; learning; mentee; mentor; quality assessment; quality feedback; teaching; Continuing education; Continuous improvement; Cultural differences; Educational institutions; Educational products; Feedback; Government; Performance gain; Psychology; Quality assessment;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • Conference_Titel
    Frontiers in Education Conference, 2001. 31st Annual
  • ISSN
    0190-5848
  • Print_ISBN
    0-7803-6669-7
  • Type

    conf

  • DOI
    10.1109/FIE.2001.963901
  • Filename
    963901