DocumentCode
3569349
Title
Differentiating assessment from evaluation as continuous improvement tools [for engineering education]
Author
Parker, Peter E. ; Fleming, Paul D. ; Beyerlein, Steve ; Apple, Dan ; Krumsieg, Karl
Author_Institution
Coll. of Eng. & Appl. Sci., Western Michigan Univ., Kalamazoo, MI, USA
Volume
1
fYear
2001
fDate
6/23/1905 12:00:00 AM
Abstract
Unleashing the potential of continuous improvement in teaching/learning requires an appreciation of the difference in spirit between assessment and evaluation. Assessment is frequently confused and confounded with evaluation. The purpose of an evaluation is to judge the quality of a performance or work product against a standard. The fundamental nature of assessment is that a mentor values helping a mentee and is willing to expend the effort to provide quality feedback that will enhance the mentee´s future performance. While both processes involve collecting data about a performance or work product, what is done with these data in each process is substantially different and invokes a very different mindset. This paper reviews the,principles and mindset underlying quality assessment and then illustrates how feedback can be enhanced within the framework of structured assessment reports
Keywords
engineering education; quality control; teaching; continuous improvement tools; engineering education; learning; mentee; mentor; quality assessment; quality feedback; teaching; Continuing education; Continuous improvement; Cultural differences; Educational institutions; Educational products; Feedback; Government; Performance gain; Psychology; Quality assessment;
fLanguage
English
Publisher
ieee
Conference_Titel
Frontiers in Education Conference, 2001. 31st Annual
ISSN
0190-5848
Print_ISBN
0-7803-6669-7
Type
conf
DOI
10.1109/FIE.2001.963901
Filename
963901
Link To Document