DocumentCode
3583931
Title
Notice of Retraction
Comparison of the hydrological models in the Upper Medway Catchment, UK
Author
Dehua Zhu ; Dingzhi Peng
Author_Institution
Dept. of Civil Eng., Univ. of Swansea, Swansea, UK
Volume
7
fYear
2010
Firstpage
3874
Lastpage
3877
Abstract
Notice of Retraction
After careful and considered review of the content of this paper by a duly constituted expert committee, this paper has been found to be in violation of IEEE´s Publication Principles.
We hereby retract the content of this paper. Reasonable effort should be made to remove all past references to this paper.
The presenting author of this paper has the option to appeal this decision by contacting TPII@ieee.org.
The two lumped conceptual models (Xinanjiang model and PDM), a semi-distributed model (TOPMODEL) and a distributed physically based model (MIKE SHE) were compared and applied to the Upper Medway catchment in Kent, UK. And the simulation results of streamflow were analyzed by using the three models. The Nash efficiency coefficient R2 were 0.80, 0.85, 0.68 and 0.92, and the total runoff relatively error RE were -14%, 18%, 16% and -5%, respectively, for Xinanjiang model, PDM, TOPMODEL and MIKE SHE in the calibration (2003-2004). And R2 were 0.75, 0.92, 0.66 and 0.92, RE were -10%, -5%, 23% and -6% in the validation (2006-2007), respectively. It showed that MIKE SHE performs better than the other models (Xinanjiang model, PDM and TOPMODEL) for the catchment.
After careful and considered review of the content of this paper by a duly constituted expert committee, this paper has been found to be in violation of IEEE´s Publication Principles.
We hereby retract the content of this paper. Reasonable effort should be made to remove all past references to this paper.
The presenting author of this paper has the option to appeal this decision by contacting TPII@ieee.org.
The two lumped conceptual models (Xinanjiang model and PDM), a semi-distributed model (TOPMODEL) and a distributed physically based model (MIKE SHE) were compared and applied to the Upper Medway catchment in Kent, UK. And the simulation results of streamflow were analyzed by using the three models. The Nash efficiency coefficient R2 were 0.80, 0.85, 0.68 and 0.92, and the total runoff relatively error RE were -14%, 18%, 16% and -5%, respectively, for Xinanjiang model, PDM, TOPMODEL and MIKE SHE in the calibration (2003-2004). And R2 were 0.75, 0.92, 0.66 and 0.92, RE were -10%, -5%, 23% and -6% in the validation (2006-2007), respectively. It showed that MIKE SHE performs better than the other models (Xinanjiang model, PDM and TOPMODEL) for the catchment.
Keywords
game theory; hydrology; water resources; MIKE SHE distributed physical based model; Nash efficiency coefficient; PDM model; TOPMODEL semi-distributed model; Upper Medway catchment; Xinanjiang model; hydrological models; runoff relatively error; Analytical models; Atmospheric modeling; Calibration; Computational modeling; Data models; Hydrology; Soil; MIKE SHE; PDM; TOPMODEL; Xinanjiang model; distributed model; lumped model;
fLanguage
English
Publisher
ieee
Conference_Titel
Natural Computation (ICNC), 2010 Sixth International Conference on
Print_ISBN
978-1-4244-5958-2
Type
conf
DOI
10.1109/ICNC.2010.5583747
Filename
5583747
Link To Document