DocumentCode
3597944
Title
How much can we trust the electromechanical delay estimated by using electromyography?
Author
Conforto, S. ; Mathieu, P. ; Schmid, M. ; Bibbo, D. ; Floresta, J.R. ; Alessio, T.D.
Author_Institution
Dept. of Appl. Electron., Univ. Roma Tre
fYear
2006
Firstpage
1256
Lastpage
1259
Abstract
In this paper different estimation techniques are evaluated for the assessment of electromechanical delay (EMD). The following techniques are compared for benchmarking purposes: envelope estimation and thresholding, with different subjective combinations of filters and thresholds, and a double threshold statistical detector (DTD). Performances are compared in terms of bias, standard deviation and erroneous detections of the estimations. DTD showed higher robustness and repeatability of results, guaranteed by the objective settings based on the statistical characteristics of the algorithm
Keywords
delay estimation; electromechanical effects; electromyography; neurophysiology; statistical analysis; benchmarking purposes; double threshold statistical detector; electromechanical delay estimation; electromyography; envelope estimation; erroneous detection; standard deviation; statistical characteristics; Cities and towns; Delay effects; Delay estimation; Electromyography; Envelope detectors; Fatigue; Filtering; Low pass filters; Muscles; Protocols;
fLanguage
English
Publisher
ieee
Conference_Titel
Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 2006. EMBS '06. 28th Annual International Conference of the IEEE
ISSN
1557-170X
Print_ISBN
1-4244-0032-5
Electronic_ISBN
1557-170X
Type
conf
DOI
10.1109/IEMBS.2006.259335
Filename
4461987
Link To Document