• DocumentCode
    3597944
  • Title

    How much can we trust the electromechanical delay estimated by using electromyography?

  • Author

    Conforto, S. ; Mathieu, P. ; Schmid, M. ; Bibbo, D. ; Floresta, J.R. ; Alessio, T.D.

  • Author_Institution
    Dept. of Appl. Electron., Univ. Roma Tre
  • fYear
    2006
  • Firstpage
    1256
  • Lastpage
    1259
  • Abstract
    In this paper different estimation techniques are evaluated for the assessment of electromechanical delay (EMD). The following techniques are compared for benchmarking purposes: envelope estimation and thresholding, with different subjective combinations of filters and thresholds, and a double threshold statistical detector (DTD). Performances are compared in terms of bias, standard deviation and erroneous detections of the estimations. DTD showed higher robustness and repeatability of results, guaranteed by the objective settings based on the statistical characteristics of the algorithm
  • Keywords
    delay estimation; electromechanical effects; electromyography; neurophysiology; statistical analysis; benchmarking purposes; double threshold statistical detector; electromechanical delay estimation; electromyography; envelope estimation; erroneous detection; standard deviation; statistical characteristics; Cities and towns; Delay effects; Delay estimation; Electromyography; Envelope detectors; Fatigue; Filtering; Low pass filters; Muscles; Protocols;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • Conference_Titel
    Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 2006. EMBS '06. 28th Annual International Conference of the IEEE
  • ISSN
    1557-170X
  • Print_ISBN
    1-4244-0032-5
  • Electronic_ISBN
    1557-170X
  • Type

    conf

  • DOI
    10.1109/IEMBS.2006.259335
  • Filename
    4461987