• DocumentCode
    3607425
  • Title

    The ML-EM Algorithm is Not Optimal for Poisson Noise

  • Author

    Zeng, Gengsheng L.

  • Author_Institution
    Dept. of Eng., Weber State Univ., Ogden, UT, USA
  • Volume
    62
  • Issue
    5
  • fYear
    2015
  • Firstpage
    2096
  • Lastpage
    2101
  • Abstract
    The ML-EM (maximum likelihood expectation maximization) algorithm is the most popular image reconstruction method when the measurement noise is Poisson distributed. This short paper considers the problem that for a given noisy projection data set, whether the ML-EM algorithm is able to provide an approximate solution that is close to the true solution. It is well-known that the ML-EM algorithm at early iterations converges towards the true solution and then in later iterations diverges away from the true solution. Therefore a potential good approximate solution can only be obtained by early termination. This short paper argues that the ML-EM algorithm is not optimal in providing such an approximate solution. In order to show that the ML-EM algorithm is not optimal, it is only necessary to provide a different algorithm that performs better. An alternative algorithm is suggested in this paper and this alternative algorithm is able to outperform the ML-EM algorithm.
  • Keywords
    Poisson distribution; image reconstruction; medical image processing; noise; ML-EM algorithm; Poisson noise; approximate solution; image reconstruction method; maximum likelihood expectation maximization; noise Poisson distribution; noisy projection data set; true solution; Approximation algorithms; Image reconstruction; Noise; Noise level; Noise measurement; Phantoms; Positron emission tomography; Computed tomography; Poisson noise; expectation maximization (EM); iterative reconstruction; maximum likelihood (ML); noise weighted image reconstruction; positron emission tomography (PET); single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT);
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Journal_Title
    Nuclear Science, IEEE Transactions on
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • ISSN
    0018-9499
  • Type

    jour

  • DOI
    10.1109/TNS.2015.2475128
  • Filename
    7286869