DocumentCode
3607425
Title
The ML-EM Algorithm is Not Optimal for Poisson Noise
Author
Zeng, Gengsheng L.
Author_Institution
Dept. of Eng., Weber State Univ., Ogden, UT, USA
Volume
62
Issue
5
fYear
2015
Firstpage
2096
Lastpage
2101
Abstract
The ML-EM (maximum likelihood expectation maximization) algorithm is the most popular image reconstruction method when the measurement noise is Poisson distributed. This short paper considers the problem that for a given noisy projection data set, whether the ML-EM algorithm is able to provide an approximate solution that is close to the true solution. It is well-known that the ML-EM algorithm at early iterations converges towards the true solution and then in later iterations diverges away from the true solution. Therefore a potential good approximate solution can only be obtained by early termination. This short paper argues that the ML-EM algorithm is not optimal in providing such an approximate solution. In order to show that the ML-EM algorithm is not optimal, it is only necessary to provide a different algorithm that performs better. An alternative algorithm is suggested in this paper and this alternative algorithm is able to outperform the ML-EM algorithm.
Keywords
Poisson distribution; image reconstruction; medical image processing; noise; ML-EM algorithm; Poisson noise; approximate solution; image reconstruction method; maximum likelihood expectation maximization; noise Poisson distribution; noisy projection data set; true solution; Approximation algorithms; Image reconstruction; Noise; Noise level; Noise measurement; Phantoms; Positron emission tomography; Computed tomography; Poisson noise; expectation maximization (EM); iterative reconstruction; maximum likelihood (ML); noise weighted image reconstruction; positron emission tomography (PET); single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT);
fLanguage
English
Journal_Title
Nuclear Science, IEEE Transactions on
Publisher
ieee
ISSN
0018-9499
Type
jour
DOI
10.1109/TNS.2015.2475128
Filename
7286869
Link To Document