DocumentCode :
3697312
Title :
From microelectromechanical switches to nanoelectromechanical switches: Lessons and differences
Author :
Jun-Bo Yoon
Author_Institution :
School of Electrical Engineering, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST) Daejeon 34141, Republic of Korea
fYear :
2015
Firstpage :
1
Lastpage :
1
Abstract :
Since a microelectromechanical (MEM) switch with an electrostatically actuated cantilever was first demonstrated by Petersen in 1978 [1], MEM switches and nanoelectromechanical (NEM) switches have actively been researched so far by many research groups. This is because they are considered as one of the ideal switching devices, thanks to their ideal zero leakage characteristic, nearly infinite sub-threshold slope, large On/Off current ratio, low power consumption, and immunity to harsh environments. Now, we are dreaming of a NEM IC in the future (Fig. 1).
Keywords :
"Integrated circuits","Contacts","Electrical engineering","Electronic mail","Switches","Power demand","Transistors"
Publisher :
ieee
Conference_Titel :
Energy Efficient Electronic Systems (E3S), 2015 Fourth Berkeley Symposium on
Type :
conf
DOI :
10.1109/E3S.2015.7336787
Filename :
7336787
Link To Document :
بازگشت