• DocumentCode
    3734700
  • Title

    When one should consider Schmitt trigger gates

  • Author

    Valeriu Beiu;Walid Ibrahim;Mihai Tache;Fekri Kharbash

  • Author_Institution
    College of Information Technology, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain, UAE
  • fYear
    2015
  • fDate
    7/1/2015 12:00:00 AM
  • Firstpage
    682
  • Lastpage
    685
  • Abstract
    This paper compares classical CMOS logic gates with their Schmitt trigger (ST) versions, when sized both conventionally as well as unconventionally. The reason for studying ST logic gates is due to their positive feedback which leads to hysteresis and, more importantly, to their better static noise margins (SNMs)-than classical CMOS logic gates. Obviously, the larger SNMs make ST logic gates less sensitive to noises and, hence, more reliable. While lately, quite a few papers have been looking at using ST design concepts for implementing more reliable SRAM bit cells, significantly less work has been targeting combinatorial logic. Here we are going to explore the whole voltage range and performance spectrum, for a better understanding of not only the SNMs and power consumptions (at different frequencies and voltage levels) of ST NAND-2 gate, but also of the delays (speeds) they could achieve. This should give a clearer picture of the advantages/disadvantages of ST for combinatorial logic in advanced CMOS technology nodes, and implicitly identify their application range.
  • Keywords
    "Logic gates","Transistors","CMOS integrated circuits","Optimized production technology","Switches","Integrated circuit reliability"
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • Conference_Titel
    Nanotechnology (IEEE-NANO) , 2015 IEEE 15th International Conference on
  • Type

    conf

  • DOI
    10.1109/NANO.2015.7388698
  • Filename
    7388698