• DocumentCode
    375003
  • Title

    Why spread spectrum clocking of computing devices is not cheating

  • Author

    Skinner, Harry G. ; Slattery, Kevin P.

  • Author_Institution
    Intel Corp., Hillsboro, OR, USA
  • Volume
    1
  • fYear
    2001
  • fDate
    2001
  • Firstpage
    537
  • Abstract
    Spread spectrum clocking (SSC), also known as clock dithering, is a widely accepted and utilized method of reducing electromagnetic emissions to meet regulatory requirements. By intentionally spreading the energy of the clock harmonics into a band several megahertz wide, the amplitude of the radiated signals can be decreased by factors as high as 20 dB. Unfortunately some members of the radio and telecommunications industries (as well as the EMC community) view this technique as a "cheat". It has been claimed that the reduction in emissions gained by the use of SSC does not translate to a lower probability of interference, and that accordingly, devices that use clock dithering should adhere to stricter regulations. This paper addresses those concerns, and explains why they are not valid
  • Keywords
    clocks; electromagnetic compatibility; electromagnetic interference; interference suppression; EMC; clock dithering; clock harmonics energy spreading; computing devices; electromagnetic emissions reduction; radiated signals amplitude decrease; spread spectrum clocking; Chirp modulation; Clocks; Communication industry; Electromagnetic compatibility; Electromagnetic interference; Electromagnetic radiation; Electromagnetic radiative interference; Frequency domain analysis; Frequency modulation; Spread spectrum communication;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • Conference_Titel
    Electromagnetic Compatibility, 2001. EMC. 2001 IEEE International Symposium on
  • Conference_Location
    Montreal, Que.
  • Print_ISBN
    0-7803-6569-0
  • Type

    conf

  • DOI
    10.1109/ISEMC.2001.950699
  • Filename
    950699