This paper considers the characterization of

filtered images by their zero crossings. It has been suggested that

filtered images might be characterized by their zero crossings [1]. It is shown here that

filtered images, filtered in 1-D or 2-D are not, in general, uniquely given within a scalar by their zero crossing locations. Two theorems in support of such a suggestion are considered. We consider the differences between the requirements of Logan\´s theorem and

filtering, and show that the zero crossings which result from these two situations differ significantly in number and location. Logan\´s theorem is therefore not applicable to

filtered images. A recent theorem by Curtis [8] on the adequacy of zero crossings of 2-D functions is also considered. It is shown that the requirements of Curtis\´ theorem are not satisfied by all

filtered images. An example of two different

filtered images with the same zero crossings is presented.