DocumentCode
431827
Title
Which constant modulus criterion is better for blind adaptive filtering: CM(1,2) or CM(2,2)? [equalizer example]
Author
Bellanger, M.
Author_Institution
CNAM, Paris, France
Volume
4
fYear
2005
fDate
18-23 March 2005
Abstract
The two most important constant modulus criteria are studied and compared, exploiting recently obtained results. A theoretical analysis of the performance is provided and excess output MSE figures are derived. The answer to the title question is found to depend on the output error power. In applications where the lower bound for the output signal-to-noise ratio is small, typically less than 8 dB, the CM(2,2) criterion can be employed. Otherwise, the CM(1,2) criterion is preferable. This result can be of great help to system designers, to select the constant modulus criterion that best suits their application and their performance objectives.
Keywords
adaptive filters; blind equalisers; mean square error methods; MSE; Suyama-Attux approximation; blind adaptive filtering; blind equalizer; constant modulus criterion; output error power dependency; output signal-to-noise ratio; Adaptive equalizers; Adaptive filters; Cost function; Data communication; Equations; Filtering algorithms; Interference cancellation; Performance analysis; Signal to noise ratio; Source separation;
fLanguage
English
Publisher
ieee
Conference_Titel
Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 2005. Proceedings. (ICASSP '05). IEEE International Conference on
ISSN
1520-6149
Print_ISBN
0-7803-8874-7
Type
conf
DOI
10.1109/ICASSP.2005.1415937
Filename
1415937
Link To Document