• DocumentCode
    431827
  • Title

    Which constant modulus criterion is better for blind adaptive filtering: CM(1,2) or CM(2,2)? [equalizer example]

  • Author

    Bellanger, M.

  • Author_Institution
    CNAM, Paris, France
  • Volume
    4
  • fYear
    2005
  • fDate
    18-23 March 2005
  • Abstract
    The two most important constant modulus criteria are studied and compared, exploiting recently obtained results. A theoretical analysis of the performance is provided and excess output MSE figures are derived. The answer to the title question is found to depend on the output error power. In applications where the lower bound for the output signal-to-noise ratio is small, typically less than 8 dB, the CM(2,2) criterion can be employed. Otherwise, the CM(1,2) criterion is preferable. This result can be of great help to system designers, to select the constant modulus criterion that best suits their application and their performance objectives.
  • Keywords
    adaptive filters; blind equalisers; mean square error methods; MSE; Suyama-Attux approximation; blind adaptive filtering; blind equalizer; constant modulus criterion; output error power dependency; output signal-to-noise ratio; Adaptive equalizers; Adaptive filters; Cost function; Data communication; Equations; Filtering algorithms; Interference cancellation; Performance analysis; Signal to noise ratio; Source separation;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • Conference_Titel
    Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 2005. Proceedings. (ICASSP '05). IEEE International Conference on
  • ISSN
    1520-6149
  • Print_ISBN
    0-7803-8874-7
  • Type

    conf

  • DOI
    10.1109/ICASSP.2005.1415937
  • Filename
    1415937