• DocumentCode
    467383
  • Title

    Semiconductor Optical Amplifiers for FTTx

  • Author

    Spiekman, Leo ; Piehler, David ; Iannone, Pat ; Reichmann, Ken ; Lee, Han-Hyub

  • Author_Institution
    Alphion Corp., Princeton
  • Volume
    2
  • fYear
    2007
  • fDate
    1-5 July 2007
  • Firstpage
    48
  • Lastpage
    50
  • Abstract
    Access networking is a hot topic. After Japan and Korea, demand is now picking up also in Europe and the US. After cherry-picking the easy installs, operators find that they could use a power boost in their passive optical networks to reach further out neighbourhoods from their present set of PON central offices. Hence the push for introducing optical amplification in access. As always, the main aim is cost reduction. Fewer COs means lower opex, while amplification before the PON splitter may mean higher split ratios, which in turn means that the same central office equipment can serve more end customers. Given the wavelength plan of a typical PON, the choice of optical amplifiers is limited to SOAs or Raman-assisted SOAs, depending on whether gain-flattened operation in a CWDM-PON is desired. Possible locations of the amplifier are as a booster/preamp at the OLT, or as a line amplifier near the passive splitter. These set different output power / noise figure requirements, where the in-line configuration allows for longer distances between the CO and the end customer, and/or higher split ratios. Operating regimes to be distinguished are NF-limited, gain limited, and power limited. Access networking is a hot topic. After Japan and Korea, demand is now picking up also in Europe and the US. After cherry-picking the easy installs, operators find that they could use a power boost in their passive optical networks to reach further out neighbourhoods from their present set of PON central offices. Hence the push for introducing optical amplification in access. As always, the main aim is cost reduction. Fewer COs means lower opex, while amplification before the PON splitter may mean higher split ratios, which in turn means that the same central office equipment can serve more end customers. Given the wavelength plan of a typical PON, the choice of optical amplifiers is limited to SOAs or Raman-assisted SOAs, depending on whether gain-flattened operation in a CWDM-PON is des- ired. Possible locations of the amplifier are as a booster/preamp at the OLT, or as a line amplifier near the passive splitter. These set different output power / noise figure requirements, where the in-line configuration allows for longer distances between the CO and the end customer, and/or higher split ratios. Operating regimes to be distinguished are NF-limited, gain limited, and power limited.
  • Keywords
    cost reduction; optical fibre networks; optical fibre subscriber loops; semiconductor optical amplifiers; CWDM-PON; FTTx; NF-limited operation; PON central offices; Raman-assisted SOA; access networking; central office equipment; cost reduction; gain limited operation; optical amplification; passive optical networks; power limited operation; semiconductor optical amplifiers; Central office; Costs; Europe; Operational amplifiers; Optical amplifiers; Optical noise; Passive optical networks; Power generation; Semiconductor optical amplifiers; Stimulated emission; Fiber to the Home; Optical Amplifiers; Passive Optical Network;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • Conference_Titel
    Transparent Optical Networks, 2007. ICTON '07. 9th International Conference on
  • Conference_Location
    Rome
  • Print_ISBN
    1-4244-1249-8
  • Electronic_ISBN
    1-4244-1249-8
  • Type

    conf

  • DOI
    10.1109/ICTON.2007.4296137
  • Filename
    4296137