• DocumentCode
    471391
  • Title

    Comparison of Neuromuscular Abnormalities between Upper and Lower Extremities in Hemiparetic Stroke

  • Author

    Mirbagheri, M.M. ; AliBiglou, L. ; Thajchayapong, M. ; Lilaonitkul, T. ; Rymer, W.Z.

  • Author_Institution
    Dept. of Phys. Medicine & Rehabilitation, Northwestern Univ., Evanston, IL
  • fYear
    2006
  • fDate
    Aug. 30 2006-Sept. 3 2006
  • Firstpage
    303
  • Lastpage
    306
  • Abstract
    We studied the neuromuscular mechanical properties of the elbow and ankle joints in chronic, hemiparetic stroke patients and healthy subjects. System identification techniques were used to characterize the mechanical abnormalities of these joints and to identify the contribution of intrinsic and reflex stiffness to these abnormalities. Modulation of intrinsic and reflex stiffness with the joint angle was studied by applying PRBS perturbations to the joint at different joint angles. The experiments were performed for both spastic (stroke) and contralateral (control) sides of stroke patients and one side of healthy (normal) subjects. We found reflex stiffness gain (GR) was significantly larger in the stroke than the control side for both elbow and ankle joints. GR was also strongly position dependent in both joints. However, the modulation of GR with position was slightly different in two joints. GR was also larger in the control than the normal joints but the differences were significant only for the ankle joint. Intrinsic stiffness gain (K) was also significantly larger in the stroke than the control joint at elbow extended positions and at ankle dorsiflexed positions. Modulation of K with the ankle angle was similar for stroke, control and normal groups. In contrast, the position dependency of the elbow was different. K was larger in the control than normal ankle whereas it was lower in the control than normal elbow. However, the differences were not significant for any joint. The findings demonstrate that both reflex and intrinsic stiffness gain increase abnormally in both upper and lower extremities. However, the major contribution of intrinsic and reflex stiffness to the abnormalities is at the end of ROM and at the middle ROM, respectively. The results also demonstrate that the neuromuscular properties of the contralateral limb are not normal suggesting that it may not be used as a suitable control at least for the an- - kle study
  • Keywords
    biomechanics; bone; muscle; neurophysiology; patient rehabilitation; PRBS perturbation; ankle joints; elbow joints; hemiparetic stroke; intrinsic stiffness; lower extremities; neuromuscular abnormalities; neuromuscular mechanical properties; reflex stiffness; spasticity; system identification techniques; upper extremities; Cities and towns; Elbow; Extremities; Mechanical factors; Muscles; Neuromuscular; Read only memory; System identification; Torque; USA Councils; ankle; elbow; identification; intrinsic; reflex; spasticity; stiffness; stroke;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • Conference_Titel
    Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 2006. EMBS '06. 28th Annual International Conference of the IEEE
  • Conference_Location
    New York, NY
  • ISSN
    1557-170X
  • Print_ISBN
    1-4244-0032-5
  • Electronic_ISBN
    1557-170X
  • Type

    conf

  • DOI
    10.1109/IEMBS.2006.260530
  • Filename
    4461745