• DocumentCode
    471702
  • Title

    Double-Blind Comparison of Survival Analysis Models Using a Bespoke Web System

  • Author

    Taktak, A.F.G. ; Setzkorn, C. ; Damato, B.E.

  • Author_Institution
    Dept. Clinical Eng., R. Liverpool Univ. Hosp.
  • fYear
    2006
  • fDate
    Aug. 30 2006-Sept. 3 2006
  • Firstpage
    2466
  • Lastpage
    2469
  • Abstract
    The aim of this study was to carry out a comparison of different linear and non-linear models from different centres on a common dataset in a double-blind manner to eliminate bias. The dataset was shared over the Internet using a secure bespoke environment called geoconda. Models evaluated included: (1) Cox model, (2) Log Normal model, (3) Partial Logistic Spline, (4) Partial Logistic Artificial Neural Network and (5) Radial Basis Function Networks. Graphical analysis of the various models with the Kaplan-Meier values were carried out in 3 survival groups in the test set classified according to the TNM staging system. The discrimination value for each model was determined using the area under the ROC curve. Results showed that the Cox model tended towards optimism whereas the partial logistic Neural Networks showed slight pessimism
  • Keywords
    Internet; graph theory; log normal distribution; medical computing; radial basis function networks; sensitivity analysis; splines (mathematics); Cox model; Internet; Kaplan-Meier values; ROC curve; TNM staging system; bespoke Web system; double-blind comparison; geoconda; graphical analysis; linear model; log normal model; nonlinear model; partial logistic artificial neural network; partial logistic spline; radial basis function network; survival analysis model; Artificial neural networks; Cancer; Cities and towns; Clinical diagnosis; Hospitals; Internet; Job production systems; Logistics; Testing; USA Councils;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • Conference_Titel
    Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 2006. EMBS '06. 28th Annual International Conference of the IEEE
  • Conference_Location
    New York, NY
  • ISSN
    1557-170X
  • Print_ISBN
    1-4244-0032-5
  • Electronic_ISBN
    1557-170X
  • Type

    conf

  • DOI
    10.1109/IEMBS.2006.259797
  • Filename
    4462294