DocumentCode
501569
Title
Measuring total electron content with GNSS: Investigation of two different techniques
Author
Bidaine, B. ; Warnant, R.
Author_Institution
F.R.S.-FNRS, Univ. of Liege (ULg), Liege
fYear
2009
fDate
28-30 April 2009
Firstpage
1
Lastpage
6
Abstract
The ionosphere widely affects Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS) applications, inducing among others a delay in GNSS measurements. This delay is closely linked to the Total Electron Content (TEC) of the ionosphere, a major parameter which can hence be monitored using GNSS. To this extent, phase measurements are taken as a basis for their lower noise level. Levelling strategies have then to be defined for the phase measurements are obtained with an initial unknown number of cycles called ambiguity. The most common technique, referred to as carrier-to-code levelling, consists in using the differences between code and phase measurements and their average on a continuous set of epochs. This option, chosen at the Royal Meteorological Institute (RMI) of Belgium to compute TEC for Belgian GPS stations, requires code hardware delays estimation. Another has been proposed which takes benefit from Global Ionospheric Maps (GIMs) to compute a reference TEC used for ambiguity resolution. In order to understand the consequences of using one method or the other, we compare slant TEC data obtained from both techniques for a mid-latitude station (Brussels) during a high solar activity period (2002). We observed large differences (6.8 TECu on average) showing features apparently related to ionospheric and geomagnetic activity. We attribute these observations to a combination of effects originating in code delays estimation, multipath and noise as well as GIMs errors. We try to differentiate between these effects by focusing on several days and satellites. We concentrate for example on days presenting large TEC differences and geomagnetic disturbances simultaneously (or not) or on satellites displaying recurrent patterns on consecutive days. Finally we highlight the impact of the choice of GIMs involved in sTEC calibration. To this extent, we analyse vertical TEC statistics showing a general underestimation from RMI data. The highest bias (5.8 TECu) is obtained for the UPC GIMs
Keywords
satellite navigation; GNSS; Global Ionospheric Maps; Global Navigation Satellite Systems; total electron content; Global Ionospheric Maps (GIMs); Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS); TEC comparison; Total Electron Content (TEC); sTEC calibration;
fLanguage
English
Publisher
iet
Conference_Titel
Ionospheric radio Systems and Techniques, 2009. (IRST 2009). The Institution of Engineering and Technology 11th International Conference on
Conference_Location
Edinburgh
ISSN
0537-9989
Print_ISBN
978-1-84919-123-4
Type
conf
Filename
5235564
Link To Document