• DocumentCode
    52780
  • Title

    A Case Study on a Quality Assurance Process for a Scientific Framework

  • Author

    Remmel, Hanna ; Paech, Barbara ; Engwer, Christian ; Bastian, Peter

  • Volume
    16
  • Issue
    3
  • fYear
    2014
  • fDate
    May-June 2014
  • Firstpage
    58
  • Lastpage
    66
  • Abstract
    In the quality assurance of scientific frameworks, both the special characteristics of scientific software and the large variability in frameworks must be accounted for. In previous research, the authors developed a process for handling the variability of a framework using software product line variability modeling. They described the design of a quality assurance process for scientific frameworks. This article reports on a case study analyzing the feasibility and acceptance by developers for two parts of the quality assurance process: variability model creation and desk-checking. The main results of the case study are that variability modeling is feasible for the development; however, a different variability modeling language is needed to be able to represent all important aspects. This study found acceptance of variability modeling and desk-checking.
  • Keywords
    quality assurance; software product lines; software quality; desk-checking; quality assurance process; scientific framework variability handling; scientific software; software product line variability modeling; variability model creation; Mathematical model; Quality assurance; Scientific computing; Software engineering; Software quality; Systematics; methods for SQA and V&V; review and evaluation; scientific computing;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Journal_Title
    Computing in Science & Engineering
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • ISSN
    1521-9615
  • Type

    jour

  • DOI
    10.1109/MCSE.2014.57
  • Filename
    6834717