DocumentCode
541624
Title
Monophasic vs. biphasic stimulation of single cardiomyocite cell: A simulation study
Author
Caselli, Monica ; Severi, Stefano ; Casaleggio, Aldo
Author_Institution
Univ. of Bologna, Cesena, Italy
fYear
2010
fDate
26-29 Sept. 2010
Firstpage
625
Lastpage
628
Abstract
Mechanisms involved in the initiation of fibrillation and defibrillation are complex and still not totally understood. This paper computationally investigated the effect of monophasic, biphasic and reversed biphasic stimuli on single cardiomyocyte, with a modified Ten Tusscher model of human ventricular action potential (AP) and calcium dynamics. Three different S1-S2 protocols with variable duration were used: monophasic, biphasic and reversed biphasic. Results were expressed in terms of total response duration (TRD), defined as the interval between the S1 onset and the response generated by S2. TRD was focused both on AP (Vm-TRD) and on Calcium transient (Ca-TRD). Simulations confirmed previous results obtained with the Beeler-Reuter model pointing to the role of INa in prolonging the refractory period when using a biphasic stimulus. No differential effects of biphasic vs monophasic stimulation when Ca-TRDs are compared instead of Vm-TRDs were found.
Keywords
bioelectric potentials; cardiology; cellular biophysics; neuromuscular stimulation; Beeler-Reuter model; S1-S2 protocols; biphasic stimulation; calcium dynamics; defibrillation; human ventricular action potential; modified Ten Tusscher model; monophasic stimulation; monophasic stimuli; refractory period; reversed biphasic stimuli; single cardiomyocite cell; single cardiomyocyte; Calcium; Cardiology; Computational modeling; Electric shock; Heart; Humans; Transient analysis;
fLanguage
English
Publisher
ieee
Conference_Titel
Computing in Cardiology, 2010
Conference_Location
Belfast
ISSN
0276-6547
Print_ISBN
978-1-4244-7318-2
Type
conf
Filename
5738050
Link To Document