• DocumentCode
    544935
  • Title

    Hemodialyzer (H) vs. artificial lung (AL). An in vitro study for Extracorporeal CO2 remov AL (CO2R)

  • Author

    Lautier, A. ; Gille, J.P. ; Tousseul, B.

  • Author_Institution
    INSERM U 256, Hopital BROUSSAIS, Paris, France
  • Volume
    4
  • fYear
    1992
  • fDate
    Oct. 29 1992-Nov. 1 1992
  • Firstpage
    1300
  • Lastpage
    1301
  • Abstract
    Adult respiratory distress syndrom[6] could be treated . in Intensive Care Unit using Extracorporeal (EC) CO2R techniques. In order to obtain the lowest blood flow rate ECCO2 appears to be the earliest and easiest procedure. ECCO2 can be achieved either by using AL or H. CO2R with the AL device concerns the "dry" form (dissolved CO2) whereas the H device involves the "wet" form of CO2 (bicarbonates). The work under study compares one AL (DIDECO D702) with one H (HOSPAL H10-10) device under different in vitro conditions. Four series of experiments were achieved : I. AL D702 without acidification II.AL D702 with inlet HC1 acidification III.H H10-10 without dialyzate alkalinization IV.H H10-10 with NaOH dialyzate alkalinization.
  • Keywords
    biochemistry; carbon compounds; geriatrics; haemodynamics; lung; pneumodynamics; CO2; acidification; adult respiratory distress syndrome; artificial lung; dialyzate alkalinization; dissolving; extracorporeal removal; extracorporeal techniques; four series; hemodialyzer; inlet acidification; intensive care unit; lowest blood flow rate; Carbon; Heating; Protocols;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • Conference_Titel
    Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 1992 14th Annual International Conference of the IEEE
  • Conference_Location
    Paris
  • Print_ISBN
    0-7803-0785-2
  • Type

    conf

  • DOI
    10.1109/IEMBS.1992.5761800
  • Filename
    5761800