DocumentCode
544935
Title
Hemodialyzer (H) vs. artificial lung (AL). An in vitro study for Extracorporeal CO2 remov AL (CO2 R)
Author
Lautier, A. ; Gille, J.P. ; Tousseul, B.
Author_Institution
INSERM U 256, Hopital BROUSSAIS, Paris, France
Volume
4
fYear
1992
fDate
Oct. 29 1992-Nov. 1 1992
Firstpage
1300
Lastpage
1301
Abstract
Adult respiratory distress syndrom[6] could be treated . in Intensive Care Unit using Extracorporeal (EC) CO2R techniques. In order to obtain the lowest blood flow rate ECCO2 appears to be the earliest and easiest procedure. ECCO2 can be achieved either by using AL or H. CO2R with the AL device concerns the "dry" form (dissolved CO2) whereas the H device involves the "wet" form of CO2 (bicarbonates). The work under study compares one AL (DIDECO D702) with one H (HOSPAL H10-10) device under different in vitro conditions. Four series of experiments were achieved : I. AL D702 without acidification II.AL D702 with inlet HC1 acidification III.H H10-10 without dialyzate alkalinization IV.H H10-10 with NaOH dialyzate alkalinization.
Keywords
biochemistry; carbon compounds; geriatrics; haemodynamics; lung; pneumodynamics; CO2; acidification; adult respiratory distress syndrome; artificial lung; dialyzate alkalinization; dissolving; extracorporeal removal; extracorporeal techniques; four series; hemodialyzer; inlet acidification; intensive care unit; lowest blood flow rate; Carbon; Heating; Protocols;
fLanguage
English
Publisher
ieee
Conference_Titel
Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 1992 14th Annual International Conference of the IEEE
Conference_Location
Paris
Print_ISBN
0-7803-0785-2
Type
conf
DOI
10.1109/IEMBS.1992.5761800
Filename
5761800
Link To Document