• DocumentCode
    545062
  • Title

    The relationship between binocular and monocular visually evoked potentials elicited by uniform field stimulation

  • Author

    Chao, Gung-rnei ; Odom, J. Vernon

  • Author_Institution
    Dept. of Ophthalmology, West Virginia Univ. Health Sci. Center, Morgantown, WV, USA
  • Volume
    4
  • fYear
    1992
  • fDate
    Oct. 29 1992-Nov. 1 1992
  • Firstpage
    1600
  • Lastpage
    1601
  • Abstract
    We elicited binocular and monocular VEPs using sinusoidally modulated uniform fields. The amplitudes and phases of the first and second harmonics were used to compare the binocular VEP to the monocular VEPs and their vector sum. We found that 1) binocular VEP first and second harmonic phases are more stable as contrast increases than monocular VEP phases, 2) the binocular VEP first and second harmonic amplitudes are greater than those of monocular VEPs, 3) the binocular VEP first harmonic amplitude is greater than the vector sum of the left and right monocular VEPs, but 4) the binocular VEP second harmonic amplitude equals the vector sum of the monocular VEPs.
  • Keywords
    eye; visual evoked potentials; binocular VEP; binocular visually evoked potential; monocular VEP; monocular visually evoked potential; second harmonic amplitude; uniform field stimulation; vector sum;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • Conference_Titel
    Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 1992 14th Annual International Conference of the IEEE
  • Conference_Location
    Paris
  • Print_ISBN
    0-7803-0785-2
  • Type

    conf

  • DOI
    10.1109/IEMBS.1992.5761943
  • Filename
    5761943