DocumentCode
578758
Title
Ecodesign self-regulation: A price too high?
Author
Cassells, Sheila ; Mattei, Adriana
Author_Institution
Digital Interoperability Forum (DIF), Brussels, Belgium
fYear
2012
fDate
9-12 Sept. 2012
Firstpage
1
Lastpage
6
Abstract
Self-regulation has priority in the Ecodesign Directive, subject to meeting certain criteria intended to impose higher obligations than an Implementing Measure (IM) on industry. Only 4 self-regulatory approaches have been proposed to date. This paper explores the criteria set by the Commission, taking the Voluntary Agreement for Complex Set Top Boxes (VA for CSTBs) as a case study. Using the findings from the 1st Independent Inspector report and experience of the operation of the VA the paper demonstrates that the VA meets those criteria, particularly in terms of environmental ambition, transparency and accountability, but that certain aspects of the status of the VA could mean that the benefits of self-regulation are diminished. Ways to improve the effectiveness of the VA , such as publicity to extend market coverage and exchanging experience between VAs, are presented.
Keywords
design for environment; set-top boxes; Ecodesign Directive; VA for CSTB; complex set top boxes; ecodesign self-regulation; implementing measures; market coverage; voluntary agreement; Abstracts;
fLanguage
English
Publisher
ieee
Conference_Titel
Electronics Goes Green 2012+ (EGG), 2012
Conference_Location
Berlin
Print_ISBN
978-1-4673-4512-5
Electronic_ISBN
978-3-8396-0439-7
Type
conf
Filename
6360458
Link To Document