• DocumentCode
    578758
  • Title

    Ecodesign self-regulation: A price too high?

  • Author

    Cassells, Sheila ; Mattei, Adriana

  • Author_Institution
    Digital Interoperability Forum (DIF), Brussels, Belgium
  • fYear
    2012
  • fDate
    9-12 Sept. 2012
  • Firstpage
    1
  • Lastpage
    6
  • Abstract
    Self-regulation has priority in the Ecodesign Directive, subject to meeting certain criteria intended to impose higher obligations than an Implementing Measure (IM) on industry. Only 4 self-regulatory approaches have been proposed to date. This paper explores the criteria set by the Commission, taking the Voluntary Agreement for Complex Set Top Boxes (VA for CSTBs) as a case study. Using the findings from the 1st Independent Inspector report and experience of the operation of the VA the paper demonstrates that the VA meets those criteria, particularly in terms of environmental ambition, transparency and accountability, but that certain aspects of the status of the VA could mean that the benefits of self-regulation are diminished. Ways to improve the effectiveness of the VA , such as publicity to extend market coverage and exchanging experience between VAs, are presented.
  • Keywords
    design for environment; set-top boxes; Ecodesign Directive; VA for CSTB; complex set top boxes; ecodesign self-regulation; implementing measures; market coverage; voluntary agreement; Abstracts;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • Conference_Titel
    Electronics Goes Green 2012+ (EGG), 2012
  • Conference_Location
    Berlin
  • Print_ISBN
    978-1-4673-4512-5
  • Electronic_ISBN
    978-3-8396-0439-7
  • Type

    conf

  • Filename
    6360458