Title :
Learning From Data: Recognizing Glaucomatous Defect Patterns and Detecting Progression From Visual Field Measurements
Author :
Yousefi, Siamak ; Goldbaum, Michael H. ; Balasubramanian, M. ; Medeiros, Felipe A. ; Zangwill, Linda M. ; Liebmann, Jeffrey M. ; Girkin, Christopher A. ; Weinreb, Robert N. ; Bowd, Christopher
Author_Institution :
Dept. of Ophthalmology, Univ. of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
Abstract :
A hierarchical approach to learn from visual field data was adopted to identify glaucomatous visual field defect patterns and to detect glaucomatous progression. The analysis pipeline included three stages, namely, clustering, glaucoma boundary limit detection, and glaucoma progression detection testing. First, cross-sectional visual field tests collected from each subject were clustered using a mixture of Gaussians and model parameters were estimated using expectation maximization. The visual field clusters were further estimated to recognize glaucomatous visual field defect patterns by decomposing each cluster into several axes. The glaucoma visual field defect patterns along each axis then were identified. To derive a definition of progression, the longitudinal visual fields of stable glaucoma eyes on the abnormal cluster axes were projected and the slope was approximated using linear regression (LR) to determine the confidence limit of each axis. For glaucoma progression detection, the longitudinal visual fields of each eye on the abnormal cluster axes were projected and the slope was approximated by LR. Progression was assigned if the progression rate was greater than the boundary limit of the stable eyes; otherwise, stability was assumed. The proposed method was compared to a recently developed progression detection method and to clinically available glaucoma progression detection software. The clinical accuracy of the proposed pipeline was as good as or better than the currently available methods.
Keywords :
Gaussian processes; biomedical optical imaging; data analysis; edge detection; expectation-maximisation algorithm; eye; learning (artificial intelligence); medical disorders; medical image processing; mixture models; parameter estimation; pattern clustering; regression analysis; vision defects; Gaussian mixture; LR method; abnormal cluster axes; analysis pipeline; axis confidence limit determination; clinical accuracy; cluster decomposition; clustering method; cross-sectional visual field tests; expectation maximization; glaucoma boundary limit detection; glaucoma progression detection software; glaucoma progression detection testing; glaucomatous defect pattern recognition; glaucomatous progression detection; glaucomatous visual field defect pattern identification; linear regression; longitudinal visual field projection; model parameter estimation; progression assignment; progression rate; slope approximation; stable eye boundary limit; stable glaucoma eyes; visual field cluster estimation; visual field data learning; visual field measurements; Biomedical optical imaging; Data models; Mathematical model; Pipelines; Sensitivity; Standards; Visualization; Data analysis; glaucoma; machine learning; progression detection; visual field;
Journal_Title :
Biomedical Engineering, IEEE Transactions on
DOI :
10.1109/TBME.2014.2314714