DocumentCode :
589164
Title :
Learning from Multiple Annotators: When Data is Hard and Annotators are Unreliable
Author :
Wolley, Chirine ; Quafafou, Mohamed
Author_Institution :
LSIS, Aix-Marseille Univ., Marseille, France
fYear :
2012
fDate :
10-10 Dec. 2012
Firstpage :
514
Lastpage :
521
Abstract :
The crowd sourcing services became popular making it easy and fast to label datasets by multiple annotators in order to achieve supervised learning tasks. Unfortunately, in this context, annotators are not reliable as they may have different levels of experience or knowledge. Furthermore, the data to be labeled may also vary in their level of difficulty. How do we deal with hard data to label and unreliable annotators? In this paper, we present a probabilistic model to learn from multiple naive annotators, considering that annotators may decline to label an instance when they are unsure. Both errors and ignorance of annotators are integrated separately into the proposed Bayesian model. Experiments on several datasets show that our method achieves superior performance compared to other efficient learning algorithms.
Keywords :
Bayes methods; data mining; learning (artificial intelligence); Bayesian model; annotator errors; annotator ignorance; crowdsourcing services; dataset labelling; multiple naive annotator unreliability; probabilistic model; supervised learning algorithm; Approximation algorithms; Bayesian methods; Estimation; Probabilistic logic; Reliability; Supervised learning; Training; Bayesian Analysis; Crowdsourcing; Data Quality; Ignorance; Multiple Annotators;
fLanguage :
English
Publisher :
ieee
Conference_Titel :
Data Mining Workshops (ICDMW), 2012 IEEE 12th International Conference on
Conference_Location :
Brussels
Print_ISBN :
978-1-4673-5164-5
Type :
conf
DOI :
10.1109/ICDMW.2012.48
Filename :
6406483
Link To Document :
بازگشت