DocumentCode
589938
Title
Feminine language strategies as effective persuasion techniques for online technical editors
Author
Cryer, M.
Author_Institution
Auburn Univ., Auburn, AL, USA
fYear
2012
fDate
8-10 Oct. 2012
Firstpage
1
Lastpage
3
Abstract
This study of 70 Epinions.com Advisor comments on 58 product reviews examined the language strategies Advisors used in updated and non-updated reviews. Out of 30 Advisor comments on updated reviews, 20 (66%) contained hedges (a feminine language strategy); out of 40 comments on non-updated reviews, only 13 (33%) contained hedges. Conversely, only 2 (8%) comments on updated reviews contained commanding language, and 4 comments (12%) contained direct advice (masculine language strategies). Comments on non-updated reviews contained 8 (20%) instances of commanding language and 14 (35%) instances of direct advice respectively. This ongoing study suggests that using masculine language strategies in online editorial comments reduces the likelihood that the writer will update (i.e., edit), while hedged language increases this likelihood.
Keywords
gender issues; marketing; Epinions.com advisor comments; effective persuasion techniques; feminine language strategies; masculine language strategies; nonupdated reviews; online editorial comments; online technical editors; product reviews; Business; Editorials; Educational institutions; Employment; Mixers; Writing; Feminine language strategies; hedges; masculine language strategies; product reviews; technical editing;
fLanguage
English
Publisher
ieee
Conference_Titel
Professional Communication Conference (IPCC), 2012 IEEE International
Conference_Location
Orlando, FL
ISSN
2158-091X
Print_ISBN
978-1-4577-2124-3
Type
conf
DOI
10.1109/IPCC.2012.6408626
Filename
6408626
Link To Document