• DocumentCode
    589938
  • Title

    Feminine language strategies as effective persuasion techniques for online technical editors

  • Author

    Cryer, M.

  • Author_Institution
    Auburn Univ., Auburn, AL, USA
  • fYear
    2012
  • fDate
    8-10 Oct. 2012
  • Firstpage
    1
  • Lastpage
    3
  • Abstract
    This study of 70 Epinions.com Advisor comments on 58 product reviews examined the language strategies Advisors used in updated and non-updated reviews. Out of 30 Advisor comments on updated reviews, 20 (66%) contained hedges (a feminine language strategy); out of 40 comments on non-updated reviews, only 13 (33%) contained hedges. Conversely, only 2 (8%) comments on updated reviews contained commanding language, and 4 comments (12%) contained direct advice (masculine language strategies). Comments on non-updated reviews contained 8 (20%) instances of commanding language and 14 (35%) instances of direct advice respectively. This ongoing study suggests that using masculine language strategies in online editorial comments reduces the likelihood that the writer will update (i.e., edit), while hedged language increases this likelihood.
  • Keywords
    gender issues; marketing; Epinions.com advisor comments; effective persuasion techniques; feminine language strategies; masculine language strategies; nonupdated reviews; online editorial comments; online technical editors; product reviews; Business; Editorials; Educational institutions; Employment; Mixers; Writing; Feminine language strategies; hedges; masculine language strategies; product reviews; technical editing;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • Conference_Titel
    Professional Communication Conference (IPCC), 2012 IEEE International
  • Conference_Location
    Orlando, FL
  • ISSN
    2158-091X
  • Print_ISBN
    978-1-4577-2124-3
  • Type

    conf

  • DOI
    10.1109/IPCC.2012.6408626
  • Filename
    6408626