Comparison of two magnetic saturation models of induction machines

The paper considers two models of induction machines accounting for magnetic saturation. The first is a systematically-designed model based on fundamental principles, while the second is a simplified model that neglects certain terms in the first model. The paper shows that both models predict the same responses in the linear region, as well as in the nonlinear region but only for steady-state operation. To investigate the possible superiority of one model over the other, the paper considers the measurement of transient responses where the models predict different behaviors. Experimental conditions are planned by computing the eigenvalues of the linearized systems and selecting conditions with maximal differences in settling time. Surprisingly, however, the experimental data shows relatively little differences between the predictions of the models and fails to favor one model over the other.