DocumentCode :
620909
Title :
Computational fluid dynamics using in vivo ultrasound blood flow measurements
Author :
Enevoldsen, Marie Sand ; Pedersen, Mads Moller ; Hemmsen, Martin Christian ; Nielsen, Michael Bachmann ; Jensen, John A.
Author_Institution :
Dept. of Elec. Eng., Tech. Univ. of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark
fYear :
2012
fDate :
7-10 Oct. 2012
Firstpage :
1596
Lastpage :
1599
Abstract :
This paper presents a model environment for construction of patient-specific computational fluid dynamic (CFD) models for the abdominal aorta (AA). Realistic pulsatile velocity waveforms are employed by using in vivo ultrasound blood flow measurements. Ultrasound is suitable for acquisition of blood velocity profiles, but these are influenced by noise, which will cause convergence problems in CFD simulations. Therefore, physiological smoothing of the velocity profiles is needed. This paper uses the Womersley-Evans model for physiological smoothing of measured blood velocity profiles in the AA. The geometry for the CFD simulation model was obtained by segmentation of MRI scans using a 3 Tesla scanner (Magnetom Trio, Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany). Spectral velocity data were obtained from a BK Medical ProFocus scanner using a research interface. All data were obtained from healthy volunteers. The estimated and smoothed velocity profiles were quantitatively compared. The energy contained in the velocity profile after smoothing is 65% larger relative to the noise contaminated estimated profiles. In conclusion, a model environment that produces realistic patient-specific CFD simulation models without convergence issues has been developed. The data processing for the model environment can be performed within six hours which is fast enough to be used in the clinical setting.
Keywords :
biomedical MRI; biomedical ultrasonics; blood flow measurement; blood vessels; computational fluid dynamics; convergence of numerical methods; image segmentation; medical image processing; physiological models; smoothing methods; velocity measurement; BK Medical ProFocus scanner; CFD model construction; CFD simulation convergence problem; CFD simulation model geometry; MRI scan segmentation; Tesla scanner; Womersley-Evans model; abdominal aorta; blood velocity profile acquisition; clinical setting; computational fluid dynamics; data processing time; estimated velocity profile; healthy volunteer data; in vivo ultrasound blood flow measurement; measured blood velocity profile; model environment; noise contaminated estimated profile energy; noise influence; patient-specific computational fluid dynamic model; realistic pulsatile velocity waveform; research interface; smoothed velocity profile; spectral velocity data; time 6 hour; velocity profile energy; velocity profile physiological smoothing; velocity profile quantitative comparison; Blood; Computational fluid dynamics; Computational modeling; In vivo; Physiology; Smoothing methods; Ultrasonic imaging;
fLanguage :
English
Publisher :
ieee
Conference_Titel :
Ultrasonics Symposium (IUS), 2012 IEEE International
Conference_Location :
Dresden
ISSN :
1948-5719
Print_ISBN :
978-1-4673-4561-3
Type :
conf
DOI :
10.1109/ULTSYM.2012.0399
Filename :
6562368
Link To Document :
بازگشت