DocumentCode :
620968
Title :
A comparison of ultrasound image simulations with FOCUS and field II
Author :
Yi Zhu ; Szabo, Thomas L. ; McGough, Robert J.
Author_Institution :
Electr. & Comput. Eng., Michigan State Univ., East Lansing, MI, USA
fYear :
2012
fDate :
7-10 Oct. 2012
Firstpage :
1694
Lastpage :
1697
Abstract :
To achieve significant improvements in both nearfield accuracy and memory efficiency in diagnostic ultrasound simulations, B-mode imaging simulations are performed with FOCUS. Improved nearfield accuracy and memory usage is achieved in FOCUS by combining the fast nearfield method with time-space decomposition to avoid the aliasing problems caused by the impulse response. The RF signals for pulse-echo imaging with FOCUS are calculated with the square root of the input signal. The transient pressure contributions are evaluated at a point scatterer by applying the square root signal to both the transmit and receive apertures, respectively, and the pulse-echo signal is then given by the convolution. An analytically equivalent result is calculated in Field II by the convolving the second derivative of the input signal with the impulse responses for the transmit and receive apertures. B-mode simulation results are compared for a 128 element linear array with 64 active elements over the aperture and focusing at 60 mm. The results show that Field II requires a sampling frequency of fs = 500MHz to achieve a normalized error of 0.91%, whereas FOCUS achieves a smaller error of 0.78% with a sampling frequency of 35MHz.
Keywords :
acoustic convolution; acoustic field; acoustic pulses; array signal processing; digital simulation; echo; signal sampling; transient response; ultrasonic imaging; ultrasonic transducer arrays; B-mode imaging simulation; FOCUS; Field II; RF signal; aliasing problem; convolution; diagnostic ultrasound simulation; impulse response; input signal square root; linear array; memory efficiency; memory usage; nearfield accuracy; normalized error; point scatterer; pulse-echo imaging; pulse-echo signal; receive aperture; sampling frequency; square root signal; time-space decomposition; transient pressure contribution; transmit aperture; ultrasound image simulation; Apertures; Computational modeling; Computers; Imaging; Time-frequency analysis; Transducers; Ultrasonic imaging;
fLanguage :
English
Publisher :
ieee
Conference_Titel :
Ultrasonics Symposium (IUS), 2012 IEEE International
Conference_Location :
Dresden
ISSN :
1948-5719
Print_ISBN :
978-1-4673-4561-3
Type :
conf
DOI :
10.1109/ULTSYM.2012.0425
Filename :
6562502
Link To Document :
بازگشت