DocumentCode
632553
Title
Comparing multiple testing correction methods between two softwares for single nucleotide polymorphisms association analyses: Using OPRD1 and diastolic blood pressure in methadone maintenance patients as an example
Author
Yao-Sheng Chang ; Hsiao-Huei Tsou ; Sheng-Chang Wang ; Chiu-Ping Fang ; Yu-Li Liu ; Ing-Kang Ho
Author_Institution
Center for Neuropsychiatric Res., Inst. of Population Health Sci., Zhunan, Taiwan
fYear
2013
fDate
16-19 April 2013
Firstpage
154
Lastpage
159
Abstract
Multi-testing correction methods are usually applied in more than one single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of association analyses to determine the significance of results in the face of testing multiple hypotheses. One of the statistical methods applied in these analyses is called false discovery rate (FDR) procedure. In this study, we compared the FDR theories behind the statistical software of Statistical Analysis Software (SAS) and Golden Helix using a database obtained from a methadone maintenance treatment cohort in Taiwan. The association analyses were performed between the delta opioid receptor (OPRD1) of seven SNPs from rs2236861 to rs760588, or four SNPs from rs2236861 to rs419335, and the diastolic blood pressure (DBP) in both genotypes and allele types. In general linear model (GLM) of association analyses, SNP rs797397 had the most significant association with DBP among seven or four SNPs of both genotype (p=0.0012) and allele type (p=0.0004) using SAS and Golden Helix programs. The genotype and allele type of this SNP had 0.0039 and 0.0018 FDR, respectively after Benjamini and Hochberg (BH) procedure analyses using SAS program, and had 0.0083 and 0.0027 FDR, respectively after the positive false discovery rate (pFDR) analyses using Golden Helix program in seven SNPs. The genotype and allele type of this SNP had 0.0022 and 0.0015 FDR, respectively after BH analyses and 0.0047 and 0.0015 FDR, respectively after pFDR analyses in four SNPs. In summary, the pFDR had less significant level than BH procedure in the most significant GLM associations SNP in both genotypes and allele types at seven and four numbers of SNPs. The FDR values were the same in both BH and pFDR multiple corrections in the allele type of four SNPs. The BH procedure in SAS provided a more consistent FDR in both genotype and allele type of multiple correction analyses despite the number of SNPs.
Keywords
DNA; association; biochemistry; bioinformatics; blood; genetics; genomics; molecular configurations; polymorphism; program testing; statistical testing; Benjamini-Hochberg procedure analysis; Golden Helix program; OPRD1; SNP association analysis; Taiwan; allele type; delta opioid receptor 1; diastolic blood pressure; general linear model; genotype; methadone maintenance patient; methadone maintenance treatment cohort; multiple testing correction method; positive false discovery rate analysis; single nucleotide polymorphism association analysis; statistical analysis software; Bioinformatics; Computational biology; Computational intelligence; Decision support systems; Handheld computers; BH; FDR; GLM; Golden Helix; SAS; pFDR;
fLanguage
English
Publisher
ieee
Conference_Titel
Computational Intelligence in Bioinformatics and Computational Biology (CIBCB), 2013 IEEE Symposium on
Conference_Location
Singapore
Type
conf
DOI
10.1109/CIBCB.2013.6595402
Filename
6595402
Link To Document