Title :
Do scatter and random corrections affect the errors in kinetic parameters in dynamic PET? - a Monte Carlo study
Author :
Haggstrom, Ingemar ; Schmidtlein, C. Ross ; Karlsson, Magnus ; Larsson, A.
Author_Institution :
Dept. of Radiat. Sci., Umea Univ., Umea, Sweden
fDate :
Oct. 27 2013-Nov. 2 2013
Abstract :
Dynamic positron emission tomography (PET) data can be evaluated by compartmental models, yielding model specific kinetic parameters. For the parameters to be of quantitative use however, understanding and estimation of errors and uncertainties associated with them are crucial. The aim in this study was to investigate the effects of the inclusion of scattered and random counts and their respective corrections on kinetic parameter errors. The MC software GATE was used to simulate two dynamic PET scans of a phantom containing three regions; blood, tissue and a static background. The two sets of time-activity-curves (TACs) used were generated for a 2-tissue compartment model with preset parameter values (K1, k2, k3, k4 and Va). The PET data was reconstructed into 19 frames by both ordered-subset expectation maximization (OSEM) and 3D filtered backprojection with reprojection (3DFBPRP) with normalization and additional corrections (A=attenuation, R=random, S=scatter, C=correction): True counts (AC), true+random counts (ARC), true+scattered counts (ASC) and total counts (ARSC). The results show that parameter estimates from true counts (AC), true+random counts (ARC), true+scattered counts (ASC) and total counts (ARSC) were not significantly different, with the exception of Va where the bias increased with added corrections. Thus, the inclusion of and correction for scattered and random counts did not affect the bias in parameter estimates K1, k2, k3, k4 and Ki. Uncorrected total counts (only AC) resulted in biases of hundreds or even thousands of percent, emphasizing the need for proper corrections. Reconstructions with 3DFBPRP resulted in overall 20-40% less biased estimates compared to OSEM.
Keywords :
Monte Carlo methods; blood; blood vessels; expectation-maximisation algorithm; filtering theory; image reconstruction; medical image processing; phantoms; positron emission tomography; random processes; 2-tissue compartment model; 3D filtered backprojection; MC software GATE; Monte Carlo Study; PET data reconstruction; blood; dynamic PET; dynamic PET scans; dynamic positron emission tomography data; errors estimation; kinetic parameter errors; normalization; ordered-subset expectation maximization-with-reprojection; phantom; random corrections; scatter corrections; specific kinetic parameters; static background; time-activity-curves; tissue; true+random counts; Blood; Image reconstruction; Kinetic theory; Logic gates; Monte Carlo methods; Phantoms; Positron emission tomography; FLT; GATE; Monte Carlo; PET; compartment model; dynamic PET; random correction; scatter correction;
Conference_Titel :
Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference (NSS/MIC), 2013 IEEE
Conference_Location :
Seoul
Print_ISBN :
978-1-4799-0533-1
DOI :
10.1109/NSSMIC.2013.6829388