• DocumentCode
    709979
  • Title

    Magnet and core loss in a radial flux and a transverse flux PM traction motor

  • Author

    Lundmark, Sonja Tidblad ; Fard, Poopak Roshanfekr

  • Author_Institution
    Chalmers Univ. of Technol., Gothenburg, Sweden
  • fYear
    2015
  • fDate
    March 31 2015-April 2 2015
  • Firstpage
    1
  • Lastpage
    9
  • Abstract
    Verified simulation models both in 2D and 3D are used to compare a radial flux machine (IPM) with a transverse flux machine (TFM) for a traction application. The analysis highlights the importance of a dense mesh and a high number of time steps when calculating core and magnet loss. It also shows the practical handling of loss modelling in 2D and 3D respectively, including a stacking factor for the core lamination and magnet segmentation, and it is recommended that you are careful when comparing losses from 2D and 3D models. The TFM is shown to have much higher magnet loss compared to the IPM although the TFM magnet design (with ring magnets) makes segmentation very effective. However, the efficiency is still favorable for the TFM, compared to the IPM due to the relatively low copper loss in the TFM ring coil.
  • Keywords
    losses; magnetic flux; permanent magnet motors; traction motors; IPM; PM traction motor; TFM ring coil; core lamination; core loss modelling; interior permanent magnet motor; magnet loss; magnet segmentation; radial flux machine; transverse flux machine; Eddy currents; Load modeling; Magnetic cores; Magnetic flux; Magnetic losses; Solid modeling; Three-dimensional displays;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • Conference_Titel
    Ecological Vehicles and Renewable Energies (EVER), 2015 Tenth International Conference on
  • Conference_Location
    Monte Carlo
  • Print_ISBN
    978-1-4673-6784-4
  • Type

    conf

  • DOI
    10.1109/EVER.2015.7113031
  • Filename
    7113031