Author :
Useinov, A. ; Useinov, N. ; Ye, L. ; Wu, T. ; Lai, C.
Author_Institution :
Dept. of Phys., Nat. Tsing Hua Univ., Hsinchu, Taiwan
Abstract :
We present a theoretical simulation to calculate the tunnel magnetoresistance (TMR) in magnetic tunnel junction with embedded nano-particles (npMTJ). The simulation is done in the range of coherent electron tunneling model through the insulating layer with embedded magnetic and non-magnetic nano-particles (NPs). We consider two conduction channels in parallel within one MTJ cell, in which one is through double barriers with NP (path I in Fig. 1) and another is through a single barrier (path II). The model allows us to reproduce the TMR dependencies at low temperatures of the experimental results for npMTJs [2-4] having in-plane magnetic anisotropy. In our model we can reproduce the anomalous bias-dependence of TMR and enhanced TMR with magnetic and non-magnetic NPs. We found that the electron transport through NPs is similar to coherent one for double barrier magnetic tunnel junction (DMTJ) [1]; therefore, we take into account all transmitting electron trajectories and the spin-dependent momentum conservation law in a similar way as for DMTJs. The formula of the conductance for parallel (P) and anti-parallel (AP) magnetic configurations is presented as following: GsP(AP) = G0σk F, s2/4π ∫ Cos (θs) DsP(AP) Sin(θ)dθsdφ, where Cos(θs) is cosine of incidence angle of the electron trajectory θs, with spin index s=(↑,↓), kF, s, is the Fermi wave-vector of the top (bottom) ferromagnetic layers; for simplicity the top and bottom ferromagnetic layers are taken as symmetric; G0=2e2/h and σ is area of the tunneling cell. The transmission probability DsP(AP) depends on diameter of NP (d), effective mass m and wave-vector of the electron kNP attributing to the quantum state on NP (corresponding to th- k-vector of the middle layer in DMTJs [1], and which is affected by applied bias V). Furthermore DsP(AP) depends on Cos(θs), kF, s, barriers heights U1,2 and widths L1,2, respectively. The exact quantum mechanical solution for symmetric DMTJ was found in Ref.[1]. Here we employ parallel circuit connection of the tunneling unit cells, where each cell contains one NP with the average d less than 3 nm per unit cell´s area (σ =20 nm2), while tunnel junction itself has surface area S and consists of N cells (N=S/σ). The total conductance of the junction is G = Nx (G1↑+G2↑+G1↓+G2↓), where G1, s is dominant conductance with the NP (path I), G2, s is conductance of the direct tunneling through the single barrier (path II), and TMR=(GP-GAP)/GAP ×100%.
Keywords :
effective mass; electron transport theory; magnetic anisotropy; magnetic particles; nanoparticles; tunnelling magnetoresistance; Fermi wave-vector; MTJ cell; antiparallel magnetic configurations; applied bias; barrier heights; barrier widths; bottom ferromagnetic layers; coherent electron tunneling model; conduction channels; dominant conductance; double barrier magnetic tunnel junction; double barriers; effective mass; electron trajectory; electron transport; embedded nanoparticles; enhanced TMR; in-plane magnetic anisotropy; incidence angle; insulating layer; magnetic nanoparticles; parallel circuit connection; probability; quantum mechanical solution; quantum state; spin index; spin-dependent momentum conservation law; symmetric DMTJ; transmitting electron trajectories; tunnel magnetoresistance; tunneling cell; tunneling unit cells; Junctions; Magnetic anisotropy; Magnetic tunneling; Tunneling magnetoresistance;