DocumentCode
727403
Title
Crowd and Laboratory Testing, Can They Co-exist? An Exploratory Study
Author
Guaiani, Fabio ; Muccini, Henry
Author_Institution
Dept. of Inf. Eng., Comput. Sci. & Math., Univ. of L´Aquila, L´Aquila, Italy
fYear
2015
fDate
19-19 May 2015
Firstpage
32
Lastpage
37
Abstract
Crowd testing has gained a great attention in recent years, for its cost-effectiveness, impartiality, diversity, and high device and configuration coverage. Still, a number of challenges hamper its full success, such as lack of standards, limited information on critical features coverage, duplicate defect management, inappropriate reword mechanisms. Our intuition is that combining crowd testing with (a more traditional) laboratory testing, may compensate each other limitations. In order to explore how practitioners look at this possibility, we run a survey with crowd testers to understand their perception on this matter. Preliminary results are illustrated in this work.
Keywords
mobile computing; program testing; configuration coverage; cost-effectiveness; crowd testing; diversity; duplicate defect management; impartiality; laboratory testing; mobile applications; reword mechanisms; Certification; Companies; Security; Stress; Testing; Usability; crowd testing; exploratory study; laboratory and crowd testing;
fLanguage
English
Publisher
ieee
Conference_Titel
CrowdSourcing in Software Engineering (CSI-SE), 2015 IEEE/ACM 2nd International Workshop on
Conference_Location
Florence
Type
conf
DOI
10.1109/CSI-SE.2015.14
Filename
7169427
Link To Document