DocumentCode
731524
Title
Intuition vs. Truth: Evaluation of Common Myths about StackOverflow Posts
Author
Honsel, Verena ; Herbold, Steffen ; Grabowski, Jens
Author_Institution
Inst. of Comput. Sci., Georg-August-Univ., Gottingen, Germany
fYear
2015
fDate
16-17 May 2015
Firstpage
438
Lastpage
441
Abstract
Posting and answering questions on Stack Overflow (SO) is everyday business for many developers. We asked a group of developers what they expect to be true about questions and answers on SO. Most of their expectations were related to the likelihood of getting an answer or to voting behavior. From their comments, we formulated nine myths that they think are true about the platform. Then, we proceeded to use rather simple methods from statistics to check if these myths are supported by the data in the SO dump provided. Through our analysis, we determined that there is an effect for eight of the nine myths the developers believed in. However, for only four of the myths the effect size is large enough to actually make a difference. Hence, we could bust five myths the developers believed in.
Keywords
Web sites; data mining; software engineering; SO dump; StackOverflow posts; common myths evaluation; question answering; voting behavior; Business; Complexity theory; Correlation; Data mining; Metadata; Programming; XML; Myths; Posting Behavior; StackOverflow;
fLanguage
English
Publisher
ieee
Conference_Titel
Mining Software Repositories (MSR), 2015 IEEE/ACM 12th Working Conference on
Conference_Location
Florence
Type
conf
DOI
10.1109/MSR.2015.58
Filename
7180112
Link To Document