• DocumentCode
    745978
  • Title

    Are you ready for lead-free electronics?

  • Author

    Eveloy, Valérie ; Ganesan, Sanka ; Fukuda, Yuki ; Wu, Ji ; Pecht, Michael G.

  • Author_Institution
    Dept. of Mech. Eng., Univ. of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA
  • Volume
    28
  • Issue
    4
  • fYear
    2005
  • Firstpage
    884
  • Lastpage
    894
  • Abstract
    An expedient transition to lead-free electronics has become necessary for most electronics industry sectors, considering the European directives [The Waste of Electrical and Electronic Equipment (WEEE) directive requires manufacturers to reduce the disposal waste of electrical and electronic products by reuse, recycling, and other forms of recovery. The Restriction of the Use of Certain Hazardous Substances in Electrical and Electronic Equipment (RoHS) legislation restricts the use of lead, as well as cadmium, mercury, hexavalent chromium, and two halide-containing flame retardants, namely polybrominated biphenyls (PBB) and polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDE), in eight of the ten product categories identified in the WEEE directive. Unlike for WEEE, whereby EU member states are free to set more severe national legislation satisfying the WEEE directive requirements, RoHS is a single market directive. Both the WEEE and RoHS directives will become effective on July 1, 2006] , other possible legislative requirements, and market forces , . In fact, the consequences of not meeting the European July 2006 deadline for transition to lead-free electronics may translate into global market losses. Considering that lead-based electronics have been in use for over 40 years, the adoption of lead-free technology represents a dramatic change. The industry is being asked to adopt different electronic soldering materials , component termination metallurgies, and printed circuit board finishes. This challenge is accompanied by the need to requalify component-board assembly and rework processes, as well as implement test, inspection, and documentation procedures. In addition, lead-free technology is associated with increased materials, design, and manufacturing costs. [The cost of implementing the RoHS directive in the EU has been estimated to be US$ 20Bn . Intel Corporation´s efforts to remove lead from its chips have been estimated to cost the company over US$ 100 million so far]. The use of lead-free materials and processes has also prompted new reliability concerns , as a result of different alloy metallurgies and higher assembly process temperatures relative to tin-lead soldering. This paper provides guidance to efficiently implement the lead-free transition process that a- ccounts for the company´s market share, associated exemptions, technological feasibility, product reliability requirements, and cost. Lead-free compliance, part and supplier selection, manufacturing, and education and training are addressed. The guidance is presented in the form of answers to key questions.
  • Keywords
    assembling; government policies; legislation; printed circuit manufacture; soldering; European legislation; Restriction of the use of certain Hazardouse Substances; RoHS; WEEE; Waste of Electrical and Electronic Equipment directive; alloy metallurgy; component termination metallurgy; component-board assembly; electronic soldering materials; lead-free electronics; lead-free materials; printed circuit boards; Consumer electronics; Costs; Electronic equipment; Electronic waste; Electronics industry; Environmentally friendly manufacturing techniques; Industrial electronics; Lead; Legislation; Soldering; Lead-free; RoHS; tin–lead soldering;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Journal_Title
    Components and Packaging Technologies, IEEE Transactions on
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • ISSN
    1521-3331
  • Type

    jour

  • DOI
    10.1109/TCAPT.2005.859353
  • Filename
    1546202