• DocumentCode
    752452
  • Title

    Dropping Less Essential Courses

  • Volume
    22
  • Issue
    2
  • fYear
    1979
  • fDate
    5/1/1979 12:00:00 AM
  • Firstpage
    60
  • Lastpage
    62
  • Abstract
    Let´s agree on several principles. Clearly, we can´t teach everything that our students will need to know. Further, we shouldn ´t try to teach too much, for experience has shown that we accomplish more if we teach fewer subjects thoroughly. Our general objective in the undergraduate curriculum is to provide depth in one or more areas to provide the student with a marketable skill, and then to provide as much breadth as possible. If we rank-order all subjects in our curriculum as to value to the student, there will surely be some on the bottom of the list. These will be the sacred cows, courses in which professors have vested interests, Dean´s courses, courses with outdated material. Progress relates to how rapidly such courses can be eliminated. Some possible mechanisms: outside advisory committees, student advisory committees, cleverness and trickery on the part of chairmen. How can this objective be accomplished more systematically?
  • Keywords
    Accreditation; Cows; Design engineering; Educational technology; Engineering education; Maintenance engineering; Manufacturing; Marketing and sales; Reliability engineering; Technical activities;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Journal_Title
    Education, IEEE Transactions on
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • ISSN
    0018-9359
  • Type

    jour

  • DOI
    10.1109/TE.1979.4321293
  • Filename
    4321293