DocumentCode
759588
Title
Flow Control: A Comparative Survey
Author
Gerla, Mario ; Kleinrock, Leonard
Author_Institution
Dept. of Computer Science, Univ. of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
Volume
28
Issue
4
fYear
1980
fDate
4/1/1980 12:00:00 AM
Firstpage
553
Lastpage
574
Abstract
Packet switching offers attractive advantages over the more eonventional circuit-switched scheme, namely, flexibility in setting up user connections and more efficient use of resources after the connection is established. However, if user demands are allowed to exceed the system capacity, unpleasant congestion effects occur which rapidly neutralize the delay and efficiency advantages. Congestion can be eliminated by using an appropriate set of traffic monitoring and control procedures called flow control procedures. Flow control can be exercised at various levels in a packet network. The following levels are identified and discussed in this paper: hop level, entry-to-exit level, network access level, and transport level. For each level, the most representative techniques are surveyed and compared. Furthermore, the interaction between the different levels is discussed.
Keywords
Communication system traffic control; Delay effects; Flexible printed circuits; Packet switching; Resource management; Road transportation; Routing; Switching circuits; Telecommunication traffic; Throughput;
fLanguage
English
Journal_Title
Communications, IEEE Transactions on
Publisher
ieee
ISSN
0090-6778
Type
jour
DOI
10.1109/TCOM.1980.1094691
Filename
1094691
Link To Document