• DocumentCode
    759588
  • Title

    Flow Control: A Comparative Survey

  • Author

    Gerla, Mario ; Kleinrock, Leonard

  • Author_Institution
    Dept. of Computer Science, Univ. of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
  • Volume
    28
  • Issue
    4
  • fYear
    1980
  • fDate
    4/1/1980 12:00:00 AM
  • Firstpage
    553
  • Lastpage
    574
  • Abstract
    Packet switching offers attractive advantages over the more eonventional circuit-switched scheme, namely, flexibility in setting up user connections and more efficient use of resources after the connection is established. However, if user demands are allowed to exceed the system capacity, unpleasant congestion effects occur which rapidly neutralize the delay and efficiency advantages. Congestion can be eliminated by using an appropriate set of traffic monitoring and control procedures called flow control procedures. Flow control can be exercised at various levels in a packet network. The following levels are identified and discussed in this paper: hop level, entry-to-exit level, network access level, and transport level. For each level, the most representative techniques are surveyed and compared. Furthermore, the interaction between the different levels is discussed.
  • Keywords
    Communication system traffic control; Delay effects; Flexible printed circuits; Packet switching; Resource management; Road transportation; Routing; Switching circuits; Telecommunication traffic; Throughput;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Journal_Title
    Communications, IEEE Transactions on
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • ISSN
    0090-6778
  • Type

    jour

  • DOI
    10.1109/TCOM.1980.1094691
  • Filename
    1094691