Title :
Comments on "The art of back-of-the envelope ray tracing" [with reply]
Author_Institution :
Sch. of Opt., Univ. of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, USA
fDate :
5/1/2002 12:00:00 AM
Abstract :
The author argues that the original paper ("The art of back-of-the envelope ray tracing", Rolland et. al, see ibid., vol.44, p.365-72, 2001) contains unnecessary, confusing, or incomplete information and they discuss the justifications for the criticisms given. The original authors\´ responses to these comments are also included in the paper.
Keywords :
education; lenses; ray tracing; teaching; Cartesian convention; back-of-the envelope ray tracing; optics education; paper discussion; positive rays; ray angles; Education; Lenses; Ray tracing;
Journal_Title :
Education, IEEE Transactions on
DOI :
10.1109/TE.2002.1013888
