• DocumentCode
    788484
  • Title

    Resolution versus Speckle Relative to Geologic Interpretability of Spaceborne Radar Images: A Survey of User Preference

  • Author

    Ford, J.P.

  • Author_Institution
    Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91109
  • Issue
    4
  • fYear
    1982
  • Firstpage
    434
  • Lastpage
    444
  • Abstract
    A survey was conducted to evaluate user preference for resolution versus speckle relative to the geologic interpretability of spaceborne radar images. Thirteen different resolution/looks combinations were simulated from Seasat synthetic-aperture radar (SAR) data of each of three test sites. The SAR images were distributed with questionnarires for analysis by eighty-five earth scientists. The relative discriminability of geologic targets at each test site for each simulation of resolution and speckle on the images is determined here from a survey of the evaluations. A large majority of the analysts indicate that for most targets a two-look image at the highest simulated resolution is best. For a constant data rate a higher resolution is more important for target discrimination than a greater number of looks. Sand dunes require more looks than other geologic targets. Multiple-look images are preferred over the corresponding single-look image at all resolutions. The number of multiple looks that is optimal for discriminating geologic logic targets is in general inversely related to the simulated resolution.
  • Keywords
    Analytical models; Earth; Geology; Image analysis; Image resolution; Radar imaging; Spaceborne radar; Speckle; Synthetic aperture radar; Testing;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Journal_Title
    Geoscience and Remote Sensing, IEEE Transactions on
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • ISSN
    0196-2892
  • Type

    jour

  • DOI
    10.1109/TGRS.1982.350409
  • Filename
    4157331