• DocumentCode
    7975
  • Title

    CISPR 16-4-2 Equivalent Measurement Uncertainty Analysis for TEM Waveguides

  • Author

    Hamann, David ; Konerding, May-Britt ; Garbe, Heyno

  • Author_Institution
    Inst. of Electr. Eng. & Meas. Technol., Leibniz Univ., Hannover, Germany
  • Volume
    57
  • Issue
    4
  • fYear
    2015
  • fDate
    Aug. 2015
  • Firstpage
    616
  • Lastpage
    622
  • Abstract
    The result of any measurement will only be of significance if the uncertainty of the measurement method can be specified concerning its influence quantities. In the case of CISPR compliant-radiated disturbance measurements, the result of the measurement is usually compared to a given limit line. For established test methods (ETM), this comparison can be done directly if the expanded measurement uncertainty falls below a value stated for a typical test facility by the standard. In this paper, the definitions and the classification the CISPR describes for ETM are applied to transverse electromagnetic (TEM) waveguide measurements. It is shown that the overall uncertainty of a typical TEM waveguide is slightly lower than that of a typical ETM.
  • Keywords
    waveguides; CISPR 16-4-2 equivalent measurement uncertainty analysis; ETM; TEM waveguides; established test methods; transverse electromagnetic waveguide measurements; Antenna measurements; Antennas; Calibration; Electromagnetic waveguides; Measurement uncertainty; Standards; Uncertainty; Dielectric test stand; TEM waveguide; field homogeneity; measurement uncertainty;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Journal_Title
    Electromagnetic Compatibility, IEEE Transactions on
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • ISSN
    0018-9375
  • Type

    jour

  • DOI
    10.1109/TEMC.2015.2413832
  • Filename
    7073577