• DocumentCode
    80446
  • Title

    Gaussian Process Retrieval of Chlorophyll Content From Imaging Spectroscopy Data

  • Author

    Verrelst, Jochem ; Alonso, Luis ; Caicedo, Juan Pablo Rivera ; Moreno, J. ; Camps-Valls, G.

  • Author_Institution
    Image Process. Lab. (IPL), Univ. de Valencia, Paterna, Spain
  • Volume
    6
  • Issue
    2
  • fYear
    2013
  • fDate
    Apr-13
  • Firstpage
    867
  • Lastpage
    874
  • Abstract
    Precise and spatially-explicit knowledge of leaf chlorophyll content (Chl) is crucial to adequately interpret the chlorophyll fluorescence (ChF) signal from space. Accompanying information about the reliability of the Chl estimation becomes more important than ever. Recently, a new statistical method was proposed within the family of nonparametric Bayesian statistics, namely Gaussian Processes regression (GPR). GPR is simpler and more robust than their machine learning family members while maintaining very good numerical performance and stability. Other features include: (i) GPR requires a relatively small training data set and can adopt very flexible kernels, (ii) GPR identifies the relevant bands and observations in establishing relationships with a variable, and finally (iii) along with pixelwise estimations GPR provides accompanying confidence intervals. We used GPR to retrieve Chl from hyperspectral reflectance data and evaluated the portability of the regression model to other images. Based on field Chl measurements from the SPARC dataset and corresponding spaceborne CHRIS spectra (acquired in 2003, Barrax, Spain), GPR developed a regression model that was excellently validated (r2: 0.96, RMSE: 3.82 μg/cm2). The SPARC-trained GPR model was subsequently applied to CHRIS images (Barrax, 2003, 2009) and airborne CASI flightlines (Barrax 2009) to generate Chl maps. The accompanying confidence maps provided insight in the robustness of the retrievals. Similar confidences were achieved by both sensors, which is encouraging for upscaling Chl estimates from field to landscape scale. Because of its robustness and ability to deliver confidence intervals, GPR is evaluated as a promising candidate for implementation into ChF processing chains.
  • Keywords
    Bayes methods; Gaussian processes; fluorescence; geophysical image processing; hyperspectral imaging; learning (artificial intelligence); numerical analysis; regression analysis; vegetation mapping; CHRIS images; Gaussian process regression; SPARC dataset; SPARC-trained GPR model; airborne CASI flightlines; chlorophyll estimation; chlorophyll fluorescence processing chains; chlorophyll fluorescence signal; chlorophyll maps; confidence intervals; confidence maps; field chlorophyll measurements; field scale; flexible kernels; hyperspectral reflectance data; imaging spectroscopy data; landscape scale; leaf chlorophyll content; machine learning family members; nonparametric Bayesian statistics; numerical performance; numerical stability; pixelwise estimations; regression model; spaceborne CHRIS spectra; spatially-explicit knowledge; statistical method; training data set; upscaling chlorophyll estimates; Atmospheric modeling; Data models; Estimation; Ground penetrating radar; Hyperspectral sensors; Robustness; Training; CASI; CHRIS; Gaussian processes; chlorophyll content; confidence; hyperspectral; retrieval;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Journal_Title
    Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, IEEE Journal of
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • ISSN
    1939-1404
  • Type

    jour

  • DOI
    10.1109/JSTARS.2012.2222356
  • Filename
    6365271