• DocumentCode
    805562
  • Title

    Comparison of multiexcitation fluorescence and diffuse reflectance spectroscopy for the diagnosis of breast cancer (March 2003)

  • Author

    Palmer, Gregory M. ; Zhu, Changfang ; Breslin, Tara M. ; Xu, Fushen ; Gilchrist, Kennedy W. ; Ramanujam, Nirmala

  • Author_Institution
    Dept. of Biomed. Eng., Wisconsin Univ., Madison, WI, USA
  • Volume
    50
  • Issue
    11
  • fYear
    2003
  • Firstpage
    1233
  • Lastpage
    1242
  • Abstract
    Nonmalignant (n = 36) and malignant (n = 20) tissue samples were obtained from breast cancer and breast reduction surgeries. These tissues were characterized using multiple excitation wavelength fluorescence spectroscopy and diffuse reflectance spectroscopy in the ultraviolet-visible wavelength range, immediately after excision. Spectra were then analyzed using principal component analysis (PCA) as a data reduction technique. PCA was performed on each fluorescence spectrum, as well as on the diffuse reflectance spectrum individually, to establish a set of principal components for each spectrum. A Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used to determine which principal components show statistically significant differences between malignant and nonmalignant tissues. Finally, a support vector machine (SVM) algorithm was utilized to classify the samples based on the diagnostically useful principal components. Cross-validation of this nonparametric algorithm was carried out to determine its classification accuracy in an unbiased manner. Multiexcitation fluorescence spectroscopy was successful in discriminating malignant and nonmalignant tissues, with a sensitivity and specificity of 70% and 92%, respectively. The sensitivity (30%) and specificity (78%) of diffuse reflectance spectroscopy alone was significantly lower. Combining fluorescence and diffuse reflectance spectra did not improve the classification accuracy of an algorithm based on fluorescence spectra alone. The fluorescence excitation-emission wavelengths identified as being diagnostic from the PCA-SVM algorithm suggest that the important fluorophores for breast cancer diagnosis are most likely tryptophan, NAD(P)H and flavoproteins.
  • Keywords
    bio-optics; biological organs; cancer; fluorescence spectroscopy; gynaecology; learning automata; medical signal processing; pattern classification; principal component analysis; reflectivity; spectral analysis; tumours; ultraviolet spectroscopy; NAD(P)H; Wilcoxon rank-sum test; breast cancer; breast reduction surgeries; classification accuracy; diffuse reflectance spectroscopy; flavoproteins; malignant tissue samples; multiexcitation fluorescence; nonmalignant tissue samples; nonparametric algorithm; principal component analysis; support vector machine algorithm; tryptophan; ultraviolet-visible wavelength range; Breast cancer; Fluorescence; Principal component analysis; Reflectivity; Sensitivity and specificity; Spectroscopy; Support vector machine classification; Support vector machines; Surges; Testing; Algorithms; Breast Neoplasms; Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted; Humans; Pattern Recognition, Automated; Predictive Value of Tests; Principal Component Analysis; Reproducibility of Results; Sensitivity and Specificity; Spectrometry, Fluorescence; Spectrophotometry, Ultraviolet;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Journal_Title
    Biomedical Engineering, IEEE Transactions on
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • ISSN
    0018-9294
  • Type

    jour

  • DOI
    10.1109/TBME.2003.818488
  • Filename
    1237363