• DocumentCode
    815294
  • Title

    Trends in Electrical Injury in the U.S., 1992–2002

  • Author

    Cawley, James C. ; Homce, Gerald T.

  • Author_Institution
    Pittsburgh Res. Lab., Nat. Inst. for Occupational Safety & Health, Pittsburgh, PA
  • Volume
    44
  • Issue
    4
  • fYear
    2008
  • Firstpage
    962
  • Lastpage
    972
  • Abstract
    This paper updates an earlier report by the authors that studied electrical injuries from 1992 to 1998. The previous information is expanded and supplemented with fatal and nonfatal injury rates and trends through 2002. Injury numbers and rates were used to compare and trend electrical injury experience for various groups and categories. This information allowed identification of at-risk groups that could most benefit from effective electrical safety interventions. The data presented in this paper are derived from the U.S. Labor Department´s Bureau of Labor Statistics´ Census of Fatal Occupational Injuries, Survey of Occupational Illnesses and Injuries, and Current Population Survey. Between 1992 and 2002, 3378 workers died from on-the-job electrical injuries. Electricity remained the sixth leading cause of injury-related occupational death. From 1999 to 2002, 4.7% of all occupational deaths were caused by electricity, down from 5.2% in the 1992-1998 time period. The cause of death was listed as electrocution in 99.1% of fatal cases. Contact with overhead power lines was involved in 42% of all on-the-job electrical deaths. The construction industry accounted for 47% of all electrical deaths between 1992 and 2002 but showed overall improvement from 1995 to 2002 by reducing its electrical fatality rate from 2.2 to 1.5 per 100 000 workers. In addition, 46 598 workers were nonfatally injured by electricity. Contact with electric current of machine, tool, appliance, or light fixture and contact with wiring, transformers, or other electrical components accounted for 36% and 34% of nonfatal electrical injuries, respectively. Contact with underground buried power lines was involved with 1% of fatal injuries and 2% of nonfatal injuries. The research of the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health aimed at evaluating commercially available overhead power line proximity warning alarms is described. This paper is expected to be the initial step for eventual devel- - opment of a performance standard for such systems.
  • Keywords
    construction industry; electric shocks; electrical accidents; electrical safety; industrial accidents; occupational health; occupational safety; power overhead lines; risk analysis; underground transmission systems; Bureau of Labor Statistics; National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health; US Labor Department; construction industry; electrical components; electrical fatality rate; electrical injury; electrical safety intervention; electrocution; fatal injury rates; injury-related occupational death; nonfatal injury rates; occupational illnesses; occupational injuries; on-the-job electrical injuries; overhead power lines; underground buried power lines; warning alarms; Construction industry; Contacts; Current; Electrical safety; Fixtures; Home appliances; Injuries; Power overhead lines; Statistics; Wiring; Electrical burn; electrical injury; electrical safety; electrical shock; electrocution; fatality rate; injury rate;
  • fLanguage
    English
  • Journal_Title
    Industry Applications, IEEE Transactions on
  • Publisher
    ieee
  • ISSN
    0093-9994
  • Type

    jour

  • DOI
    10.1109/TIA.2008.926229
  • Filename
    4578774