DocumentCode :
831385
Title :
NIST-NPL interlaboratory pulse measurement comparison
Author :
Paulter, N.G. ; Smith, Andrew J A ; Larson, D.R. ; Souders, T.M. ; Roddie, Alan G.
Author_Institution :
Electr.ity Div., Nat. Inst. of Stand. & Technol., Gaithersburg, MD, USA
Volume :
52
Issue :
6
fYear :
2003
Firstpage :
1825
Lastpage :
1833
Abstract :
A comparison of the pulse parameter values obtained from the pulse measurement services of the National Institute of Standards and Technology, USA, and the National Physical Laboratory, U.K., was performed. The comparison was based on the pulse parameters of amplitude, transition duration, overshoot, and undershoot (preshoot). The parameter comparison was applied to raw (measured) waveforms, corrected waveforms (if applicable), and reconstructed waveforms. The results of the comparison show that the pulse parameter values for both national laboratories are within published uncertainties.
Keywords :
calibration; measurement uncertainty; pulse generators; pulse measurement; signal sampling; transient response; amplitude; corrected waveforms; equivalent-time sampling oscilloscopes; high-speed pulse generators; impulse responses; interlaboratory pulse measurement comparison; measurement uncertainties; national laboratories; overshoot; preshoot; pulse measurement services; pulse parameter values; raw waveforms; reconstructed waveforms; transition duration; undershoot; waveform processing; Attenuation measurement; Computer errors; Error correction; Gain measurement; Laboratories; NIST; Performance evaluation; Pulse generation; Pulse measurements; Time measurement;
fLanguage :
English
Journal_Title :
Instrumentation and Measurement, IEEE Transactions on
Publisher :
ieee
ISSN :
0018-9456
Type :
jour
DOI :
10.1109/TIM.2003.820456
Filename :
1246556
Link To Document :
بازگشت